European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2022
Management of Patients with Uncomplicated Symptomatic Isolated Mesenteric Artery Dissection: a Multicentre Experience.
Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sun Jinjian, Wang Lei, Que Yifu, Li Hou, Wu Kemin, Yuan Ding, Xiong Jiang, Wang Wei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Isolated mesenteric artery dissection (IMAD) is an increasingly diagnosed disease. However, multicentre studies to support clinical decision making are limited. This multicentre retrospective study aimed to investigate the characteristics, treatment options, and outcomes of IMAD.
METHODS: Data from consecutively enrolled patients with IMAD between October 2009 and May 2021 at three hospitals were collected retrospectively. One hundred and ninety uncomplicated symptomatic IMAD patients were divided into two groups: conservative (n = 141) and operative (n = 49). The costs, length of hospital stay, factors affecting outcomes, symptom relief, and complete remodelling of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were analysed between the two groups.
RESULTS: Compared with patients who received operative treatment, patients receiving conservative treatment had shorter hospital stays (8.2 ± 4.6 vs. 11.9 ± 6.4 day, p < .020) and lower hospital costs (14 900 ± 1 048 vs. 60 400 ± 7 733 yuan, p < .001). In contrast, patients receiving operative treatment showed higher complete SMA remodelling (95.9% vs. 51.8%, p < .001). The cumulative rate of symptom relief was similar between the groups (p = .71). The rates were 78% vs. 79%, 87% vs. 87%, 89% vs. 87% at one, 12, and 60 months in the conservative and operative groups, respectively. Further subgroup analysis showed that endovascular treatment of IMAD had the advantage of shorter hospital stays than open surgery (10.7 ± 4.5 vs. 25.2 ± 9.4 days, p < .010). Univariable analysis showed that Sakamoto type II was associated with failed complete SMA remodelling (odds ratio 0.34; 95% confidence intervals 0.13 - 0.91; p = .031).
CONCLUSION: IMAD patients achieved good long term survival and symptom relief regardless of the treatment. Sakamoto type II IMAD is a risk factor for failed complete SMA remodelling. Although endovascular treatment provided a higher rate of complete SMA remodelling, the conservative group had statistically significantly shorter hospital stays, lower hospital costs, and similar cumulative rates of symptom relief. Therefore, this study supports conservative treatment as the main strategy for uncomplicated symptomatic IMAD patients.
METHODS: Data from consecutively enrolled patients with IMAD between October 2009 and May 2021 at three hospitals were collected retrospectively. One hundred and ninety uncomplicated symptomatic IMAD patients were divided into two groups: conservative (n = 141) and operative (n = 49). The costs, length of hospital stay, factors affecting outcomes, symptom relief, and complete remodelling of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were analysed between the two groups.
RESULTS: Compared with patients who received operative treatment, patients receiving conservative treatment had shorter hospital stays (8.2 ± 4.6 vs. 11.9 ± 6.4 day, p < .020) and lower hospital costs (14 900 ± 1 048 vs. 60 400 ± 7 733 yuan, p < .001). In contrast, patients receiving operative treatment showed higher complete SMA remodelling (95.9% vs. 51.8%, p < .001). The cumulative rate of symptom relief was similar between the groups (p = .71). The rates were 78% vs. 79%, 87% vs. 87%, 89% vs. 87% at one, 12, and 60 months in the conservative and operative groups, respectively. Further subgroup analysis showed that endovascular treatment of IMAD had the advantage of shorter hospital stays than open surgery (10.7 ± 4.5 vs. 25.2 ± 9.4 days, p < .010). Univariable analysis showed that Sakamoto type II was associated with failed complete SMA remodelling (odds ratio 0.34; 95% confidence intervals 0.13 - 0.91; p = .031).
CONCLUSION: IMAD patients achieved good long term survival and symptom relief regardless of the treatment. Sakamoto type II IMAD is a risk factor for failed complete SMA remodelling. Although endovascular treatment provided a higher rate of complete SMA remodelling, the conservative group had statistically significantly shorter hospital stays, lower hospital costs, and similar cumulative rates of symptom relief. Therefore, this study supports conservative treatment as the main strategy for uncomplicated symptomatic IMAD patients.