MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.10.004

Медицинская библиотека · Peptides · 2007

Inducible antibacterial response of scorpion venom gland.

Gao Bin, Tian Caihuan, Zhu Shunyi

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Innate immunity is the first line defense of multicellular organisms that rapidly operates to limit aggression upon exposure to pathogen microorganisms. Although the existence of some antibacterial peptides in scorpion venoms suggests that venom gland could be protected by these effector molecules, antibacterial activity of venom itself has not been assessed. In this study, we reported the antibacterial activity of the venom of Chinese scorpion Buthus martensii. Protease K digestion test indicated that it is venom peptide/protein components, as key players, which are involved in such antibacterial response. As the first step toward studying molecular mechanism of scorpion venom gland immunity, we established an infection model which supports inducible antibacterial response of scorpion venom gland. A known B. martensii antibacterial peptide gene BmKb1 was up-regulated at the transcriptional level after venom gland was challenged, suggesting its key defense role. This is further strengthened by the presence of several immune response elements in the BmKb1 promoter region. Our work thus provides the first evidence supporting the role of venom antibacterial peptides (ABPs) in controlling scorpion venom gland infection and lays a basis for characterizing related components involved in regulation of scorpion venom gland ABP gene expression.

Для цитирования: Gao Bin, Tian Caihuan, Zhu Shunyi. Inducible antibacterial response of scorpion venom gland.. Peptides. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.10.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.