Danish medical journal · 2017
Danish translation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Larsen Peter, Boe Anne Marie, Iyer Annika B, Elsøe Rasmus
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FOAS) is a standardized instrument used to report on injury-specific clinical status following foot- and ankle-related problems. The primary aim of this study was to translate and conduct a cross-cultural adaptation of the FAOS into a Danish setting, including testing absolute agreement and the test-retest reliability of the questionnaire.
METHODS: Translation of the FAOS questionnaire was carried out according to the Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient- Reported Outcomes Measures: report of the Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation.
RESULTS: No major disagreements were observed between the original and translated version of the FAOS questionnaire during the translation procedure and cognitive interview. A total of 51 patients were included in the reliability testing procedure. The test-retest reliability was high: pain interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.93), symptoms ICC 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.97), activities of daily living ICC 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97), sport ICC 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97) and quality of life ICC 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97). The Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between test and retest for all five subscales.
CONCLUSIONS: The translation of the FAOS questionnaire into Danish was done in accordance with best practice and has excellent repeatability in patients treated for ankle fractures.
FUNDING: none.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
METHODS: Translation of the FAOS questionnaire was carried out according to the Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient- Reported Outcomes Measures: report of the Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation.
RESULTS: No major disagreements were observed between the original and translated version of the FAOS questionnaire during the translation procedure and cognitive interview. A total of 51 patients were included in the reliability testing procedure. The test-retest reliability was high: pain interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.93), symptoms ICC 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.97), activities of daily living ICC 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97), sport ICC 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97) and quality of life ICC 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97). The Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between test and retest for all five subscales.
CONCLUSIONS: The translation of the FAOS questionnaire into Danish was done in accordance with best practice and has excellent repeatability in patients treated for ankle fractures.
FUNDING: none.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.