Neonatology · 2018
Lung Ultrasound for the Differential Diagnosis of Respiratory Distress in Neonates.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Corsini Iuri, Parri Niccolò, Gozzini Elena, Coviello Caterina, Leonardi Valentina, Poggi Chiara, Giacalone Martina, Bianconi Tommaso, Tofani Lorenzo, Raimondi Francesco, Dani Carlo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress (RD) is the most common neonatal illness. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a technique previously tested in neonatal studies on RD, but literature regarding its routine clinical applicability is still lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the concordance between LUS performed by neonatologists with different training levels and chest X-ray (CXR) for the diagnosis of RD in newborns during the first 24 h of life.
METHODS: We enrolled newborns with RD during the first 24 h of life. Patients underwent LUS and CXR. LUS and CXR diagnosis were compared to evaluate concordance. Twenty percent of patients received two LUS (one from an experienced and one from a novice sonographer) to calculate the interobserver agreement. The difference in time needed to reach a diagnosis with LUS and CXR, and from novice and expert operators, was measured.
RESULTS: We studied 124 patients; 134 diagnoses were reported. The concordance between LUS and CXR diagnosis was 91% (95% CI 86-96%) with a κ statistic of 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.94). The median time to diagnosis was shorter for LUS (9.5 min, IQR 5-15) than for CXR (50 min, IQR 33-64) (p < 0.0001). In 25/124 patients, LUS was performed by both novice and experienced sonographers with complete concordance. The median time to diagnosis was shorter for expert (9 min, IQR 5-15) than novice operators (15 min, IQR 10-20) (p < 0.0002).
CONCLUSION: LUS and CXR have a high concordance in the differential diagnosis of neonatal RD in the first 24 h of life. LUS has a shorter operation time than CXR.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the concordance between LUS performed by neonatologists with different training levels and chest X-ray (CXR) for the diagnosis of RD in newborns during the first 24 h of life.
METHODS: We enrolled newborns with RD during the first 24 h of life. Patients underwent LUS and CXR. LUS and CXR diagnosis were compared to evaluate concordance. Twenty percent of patients received two LUS (one from an experienced and one from a novice sonographer) to calculate the interobserver agreement. The difference in time needed to reach a diagnosis with LUS and CXR, and from novice and expert operators, was measured.
RESULTS: We studied 124 patients; 134 diagnoses were reported. The concordance between LUS and CXR diagnosis was 91% (95% CI 86-96%) with a κ statistic of 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.94). The median time to diagnosis was shorter for LUS (9.5 min, IQR 5-15) than for CXR (50 min, IQR 33-64) (p < 0.0001). In 25/124 patients, LUS was performed by both novice and experienced sonographers with complete concordance. The median time to diagnosis was shorter for expert (9 min, IQR 5-15) than novice operators (15 min, IQR 10-20) (p < 0.0002).
CONCLUSION: LUS and CXR have a high concordance in the differential diagnosis of neonatal RD in the first 24 h of life. LUS has a shorter operation time than CXR.