European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 1989
Umbilical artery waveform analysis and biophysical profile. A comparison of two methods to identify compromised fetuses.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nordström U L, Patel N B, Taylor D J
Аннотация
Sixty-nine singleton high-risk pregnancies were assessed with both umbilical artery flow velocity waveform analysis and fetal biophysical profile within 10 days of delivery. An abnormal outcome, as defined as either small for gestational age at birth (SGA) or fetal distress during labour, was found in 30 babies. The peak systolic/end diastolic (A/B) ratio from the umbilical artery had a higher sensitivity (37%), specificity (92%), positive predictive value (79%) and negative predictive value (66%) than the fetal biophysical profile (27%, 82%, 53%, and 59%, respectively) in the diagnosis of abnormal outcome. Additional information from a real-time ultrasound assessment, such as the diagnosis of malformations and oligohydramnios could justify a combination of the two methods in antenatal monitoring of high-risk pregnancies.