MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/000348941011901010

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2010

Congenital laryngeal webs: surgical course and outcomes.

Goudy Steven, Bauman Nancy, Manaligod José, Smith Richard J H

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

We compare the success of different surgical options in the treatment of laryngeal webs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study spanning the years 1980 to 2005.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were identified. The average age at diagnosis was 6 months (range, 1 day to 2.5 years). The presenting symptoms included weak cry, stridor, airway obstruction, and difficulty breathing. Associated cardiac defects consistent with the diagnosis of 22q-syndrome were present in 7 patients. Webs were classified as grade I (5 patients), grade II (2 patients), grade III (10 patients), or grade IV (1 patient) according to the Cohen classification. In 5 patients, only endoscopic lysis was required. The remaining 13 patients underwent open procedures; 9 patients in this group required tracheotomy. An average of 1.3 open airway procedures was necessary to achieve a decannulation rate of 89%. After operation, 34% of patients had residual webbing and 20% had a weak or aphonic voice.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of laryngeal webs is dependent on the severity of airway obstruction. Grade I and II webs can be treated endoscopically; more severe laryngeal webs usually require tracheotomy and open airway reconstruction.

Для цитирования: Goudy Steven, Bauman Nancy, Manaligod José, Smith Richard J H. Congenital laryngeal webs: surgical course and outcomes.. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2010. DOI: 10.1177/000348941011901010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.