Critical care explorations · 2022
Mechanical Power Differs Between Pressure-Controlled Ventilation and Different Volume-Controlled Ventilation Modes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rietveld Petra J, Snoep Jacob W M, Lamping Marjolein, van der Velde Franciska, de Jonge Evert, van Westerloo David W, Schoe Abraham
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Mechanical power (MP) is a way of estimating the energy delivered by the ventilator to the patient. For both volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) methods have been described to calculate the MP. The pressure-volume (PV) loop, from which the MP is calculated, is different for VCV compared with PCV. We aimed to compare the MP of VCV with zero pause time (VCV-0), VCV with 10% pause time (VCV-10), and PCV within patients in different patient categories based on severity of lung injury.
DESIGN: In a proof-of-concept study, we enrolled 46 mechanically ventilated patients without spontaneous breathing efforts. Baseline measurements were done in pressure-controlled mode. Subsequently, measurements were done in VCV-0 and VCV-10. Tidal volume and all other settings were kept the same.
SETTING: ICU, single university medical center.
PATIENTS: Fifty-eight cases in 46 patients on controlled ventilation modes.
INTERVENTIONS: Comparison between the MP of PCV, VCV-0, and VCV-10.
MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean MP of VCV-0, VCV-10, and PCV was 19.30, 21.80, and 20.87 J/min, respectively (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The transpulmonary MP of VCV-0, VCV-10, and PCV was 6.75, 8.60, and 7.99 J/min, respectively (p < 0.05 for all comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients ventilated in a controlled mode, VCV without pause time had the lowest MP followed by PCV. VCV with 10% pause time had the highest MP.
DESIGN: In a proof-of-concept study, we enrolled 46 mechanically ventilated patients without spontaneous breathing efforts. Baseline measurements were done in pressure-controlled mode. Subsequently, measurements were done in VCV-0 and VCV-10. Tidal volume and all other settings were kept the same.
SETTING: ICU, single university medical center.
PATIENTS: Fifty-eight cases in 46 patients on controlled ventilation modes.
INTERVENTIONS: Comparison between the MP of PCV, VCV-0, and VCV-10.
MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean MP of VCV-0, VCV-10, and PCV was 19.30, 21.80, and 20.87 J/min, respectively (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The transpulmonary MP of VCV-0, VCV-10, and PCV was 6.75, 8.60, and 7.99 J/min, respectively (p < 0.05 for all comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients ventilated in a controlled mode, VCV without pause time had the lowest MP followed by PCV. VCV with 10% pause time had the highest MP.