MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.080

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2019

Use of Pterional Craniotomy for Removal of Penetrating Object: Case Report and Surgical Video.

O'Connor Kyle P, Palejwala Ali H, Briggs Robert G, Massoth Landon, Argo Jimmy L, Glenn Chad A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Penetrating injuries are dangerous because they can damage intracranial structures. Removal of the object carries this same risk of injury, so neurosurgeons often visualize the injury via craniotomy during removal.

CASE DESCRIPTION: This report illustrates the case of a 41-year-old man who had a penetrating injury with a knife that started in the left nasal passage and extended to the parasellar region. Computed tomography angiography revealed an associated sphenoid fracture and showed the tip of the knife within the parasellar space with preservation of the internal carotid artery, ophthalmic artery, optic nerve, and pituitary gland. The patient was taken to the operating room for a right pterional craniotomy and the knife was removed in the operating room in a combined effort between neurosurgery and otorhinolaryngology.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient progressed well without complications postoperatively and was discharged 5 days later. We provide a report with video showing our surgical approach for removal of a penetrating object through the tuberculum sellae.

Для цитирования: O'Connor Kyle P, Palejwala Ali H, Briggs Robert G, Massoth Landon, Argo Jimmy L, Glenn Chad A. Use of Pterional Craniotomy for Removal of Penetrating Object: Case Report and Surgical Video.. World neurosurgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.080.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.