Pediatric radiology · 2019
Comparison of image quality between synthetic and patients' electrocardiogram-gated 320-row pediatric cardiac computed tomography.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maeda Eriko, Shirota Go, Shibata Eisuke, Komatsu Shuhei, Ino Kenji, Torigoe Rumiko, Abe Osamu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pediatric cardiac computed tomography (CT) can be acquired without electrode placement by using synthetic electrocardiogram (ECG).
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the depiction of gross cardiac structures and coronary arteries in 320-row pediatric CT is not inferior when CT is gated with synthetic ECG at 150 beats per minute (bpm), compared to the patients' own ECG.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty 320-row CT examinations performed in children younger than 3 years old with congenital cardiac anomaly were enrolled in this retrospective study. Thirty examinations were scanned using the children's own ECG for gating and 30 examinations were scanned using synthetic ECG at 150 bpm. The image quality was compared between the two gating modes using a 3-point scale to delineate the following anatomical structures: atrial septum, ventricular septum, right atrium, right ventricle, left atrium, left ventricle, main pulmonary artery, ascending aorta, aortic arch including the patent ductus arteriosus, descending aorta, right coronary artery and left main trunk. Beam-hardening artifacts from contrast enhancement material were evaluated using a 3-point scale, and the overall image quality was evaluated using a 5-point scale.
RESULTS: Synthetic ECG was not inferior to the patients' ECG in depicting each structure, beam-hardening artifact and overall image quality. Average indices were clinically acceptable imaging quality, except for subjective image quality of mid and distal coronary arteries.
CONCLUSION: Pediatric cardiac CT in patients younger than 3 years old can be acquired using synthetic ECG gating, with image quality not inferior to the patients' ECG.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the depiction of gross cardiac structures and coronary arteries in 320-row pediatric CT is not inferior when CT is gated with synthetic ECG at 150 beats per minute (bpm), compared to the patients' own ECG.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty 320-row CT examinations performed in children younger than 3 years old with congenital cardiac anomaly were enrolled in this retrospective study. Thirty examinations were scanned using the children's own ECG for gating and 30 examinations were scanned using synthetic ECG at 150 bpm. The image quality was compared between the two gating modes using a 3-point scale to delineate the following anatomical structures: atrial septum, ventricular septum, right atrium, right ventricle, left atrium, left ventricle, main pulmonary artery, ascending aorta, aortic arch including the patent ductus arteriosus, descending aorta, right coronary artery and left main trunk. Beam-hardening artifacts from contrast enhancement material were evaluated using a 3-point scale, and the overall image quality was evaluated using a 5-point scale.
RESULTS: Synthetic ECG was not inferior to the patients' ECG in depicting each structure, beam-hardening artifact and overall image quality. Average indices were clinically acceptable imaging quality, except for subjective image quality of mid and distal coronary arteries.
CONCLUSION: Pediatric cardiac CT in patients younger than 3 years old can be acquired using synthetic ECG gating, with image quality not inferior to the patients' ECG.