VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
Retrograde device-assisted lumen-apposing metal stent insertion for candy cane syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lim-Fernandez Anne Kimberly, Lim Samuel Jun Ming, Lim Chin Hong, Khor Christopher Jen Lock, Tan Damien Meng Yew
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Candy cane syndrome is a rare adverse event of gastric bypass or gastrectomy, where a blind jejunal pouch fills with food, causing dilation and compression of the efferent limb, leading to obstructive symptoms like vomiting and regurgitation. Surgical resection is curative but technically challenging, and endoscopic treatment using lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) insertion has been attempted.
METHODS: This case describes a retrograde LAMS insertion in a patient with previous total gastrectomy who presented a decade later with dysphagia and food regurgitation. Imaging revealed an enlarged blind jejunal pouch and migration of the esophagojejunostomy anastomosis above the diaphragm and into the thoracic cavity. A tandem endoscopic approach with an ultraslim gastroscope and an echoendoscope was used to place a LAMS from the efferent limb into the blind pouch. The gastroscope is used to assist with instillation of saline and endoscopic visualization of the LAMS in the blind pouch to ensure safe deployment. A retrograde approach from the efferent limb to the blind pouch allows a larger and more stable target for puncture, and a better LAMS axis for effective diversion of food.
RESULTS: He gained 9 kg over 4 months after the procedure and was able to tolerate a normal diet. The LAMS was planned for removal after 10 to 12 months to allow longer indwelling time and greater rate of patency.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management with EUS-guided LAMS insertion is a promising alternative to surgical resection for candy cane syndrome.
METHODS: This case describes a retrograde LAMS insertion in a patient with previous total gastrectomy who presented a decade later with dysphagia and food regurgitation. Imaging revealed an enlarged blind jejunal pouch and migration of the esophagojejunostomy anastomosis above the diaphragm and into the thoracic cavity. A tandem endoscopic approach with an ultraslim gastroscope and an echoendoscope was used to place a LAMS from the efferent limb into the blind pouch. The gastroscope is used to assist with instillation of saline and endoscopic visualization of the LAMS in the blind pouch to ensure safe deployment. A retrograde approach from the efferent limb to the blind pouch allows a larger and more stable target for puncture, and a better LAMS axis for effective diversion of food.
RESULTS: He gained 9 kg over 4 months after the procedure and was able to tolerate a normal diet. The LAMS was planned for removal after 10 to 12 months to allow longer indwelling time and greater rate of patency.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management with EUS-guided LAMS insertion is a promising alternative to surgical resection for candy cane syndrome.