The American journal of sports medicine · 2004
Tibiofemoral kinematics following successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using dynamic multiple resonance imaging.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Logan Martin Charles, Williams Andrew, Lavelle Jonathon, Gedroyc Wady, Freeman Michael
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is to reduce excess joint laxity, hoping to restore normal tibiofemoral kinematics and therefore improve joint stability. It remains unclear if successful ACL reconstruction restores normal tibiofemoral kinematics and whether it is this that is associated with a good result.
STUDY: Case series.
PURPOSE: To assess the kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee using open-access MRI.
METHODS: Tibiofemoral motion was assessed using open-access MRI, weightbearing through the arc of flexion from 0 degrees to 90 degrees in 10 patients with isolated reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (hamstring autograft) in one knee and a normal contralateral knee. Midmedial and midlateral sagittal images were analyzed in all positions of flexion in both knees to assess the tibiofemoral relationship. Sagittal laxity was also assessed by performing the Lachman test while the knees were scanned dynamically using open-access MRI.
RESULTS: The amount of excursion between the tibial and femoral joint surfaces was similar between the normal and reconstructed knees, but the relationship of tibia to femur was always different for each position of knee flexion assessed-the lateral tibia being about 5 mm more anterior in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. This anterior tibial position is statistically significantly different at 0 degrees (P <.0006), 20 degrees (P =.0004), 45 degrees (P =.002), and 90 degrees of flexion (P <.006). Anteroposterior laxity was similar between normal and anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees.
CONCLUSION: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces sagittal laxity to within normal limits but does not restore normal tibiofemoral kinematics despite a successful outcome.
STUDY: Case series.
PURPOSE: To assess the kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee using open-access MRI.
METHODS: Tibiofemoral motion was assessed using open-access MRI, weightbearing through the arc of flexion from 0 degrees to 90 degrees in 10 patients with isolated reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (hamstring autograft) in one knee and a normal contralateral knee. Midmedial and midlateral sagittal images were analyzed in all positions of flexion in both knees to assess the tibiofemoral relationship. Sagittal laxity was also assessed by performing the Lachman test while the knees were scanned dynamically using open-access MRI.
RESULTS: The amount of excursion between the tibial and femoral joint surfaces was similar between the normal and reconstructed knees, but the relationship of tibia to femur was always different for each position of knee flexion assessed-the lateral tibia being about 5 mm more anterior in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. This anterior tibial position is statistically significantly different at 0 degrees (P <.0006), 20 degrees (P =.0004), 45 degrees (P =.002), and 90 degrees of flexion (P <.006). Anteroposterior laxity was similar between normal and anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees.
CONCLUSION: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces sagittal laxity to within normal limits but does not restore normal tibiofemoral kinematics despite a successful outcome.