The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2022
What is the Effectiveness of Premaxilla Surgical Repositioning and its Stabilization Methods in Mixed Dentition Patients With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate?
Систематический обзорМетаанализСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Normande Neto Henrique de Vicq, Oliveira-Neto Olavo Barbosa, Ribeiro Igor Lerner Hora, Andrade Clarisse Samara de, Sales Pedro Henrique da Hora, Lima Fernando José Camello de
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Verify the effectiveness of surgical repositioning of the premaxilla and its stabilization methods in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate during mixed dentition.
DESIGN: Systematic review.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The search was conducted in 7 databases (eg, Medline via PubMed; Scopus; Central Cochrane; LILACS; Embase, Web of Science; and Sigle via OpenGrey until August 2021), using the descriptors "premaxilla", "cleft Palate", and "bone transplantation".
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Clinical trials and observational studies that have patients with bilateral cleft who had a need for superior/posterior repositioning of the premaxilla on mixed dentition; Studies in any language was evaluted whitout time restriction of publication.
RESULTS: From 5572 records, 6 studies were included in the review with a total sample of 212 patients. Regarding the type of stabilization used in the premaxilla, the hybrid method (rigid and complementary semi-rigid stabilization) predominated, being observed in 184 patients (86.8%). A total of 17 failures were identified related to the surgical repositioning of the premaxilla, corresponding to 8% of the total number of surgeries. A meta-analysis of prevalence was performed, only with the retrospective studies. It was observed that the effectiveness rate of premaxilla repositioning was 92%, with a CI between 0.04 and 0.13, with all included studies showing a similar failure rate (0.08-0.09). The included studies also showed great homogeneity in this analysis (I2 = 0%; P = .75).
CONCLUSION: Although there are several alternatives and techniques for repositioning and stabilizing the premaxilla, the statistical result did not differ between the different techniques.
DESIGN: Systematic review.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The search was conducted in 7 databases (eg, Medline via PubMed; Scopus; Central Cochrane; LILACS; Embase, Web of Science; and Sigle via OpenGrey until August 2021), using the descriptors "premaxilla", "cleft Palate", and "bone transplantation".
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Clinical trials and observational studies that have patients with bilateral cleft who had a need for superior/posterior repositioning of the premaxilla on mixed dentition; Studies in any language was evaluted whitout time restriction of publication.
RESULTS: From 5572 records, 6 studies were included in the review with a total sample of 212 patients. Regarding the type of stabilization used in the premaxilla, the hybrid method (rigid and complementary semi-rigid stabilization) predominated, being observed in 184 patients (86.8%). A total of 17 failures were identified related to the surgical repositioning of the premaxilla, corresponding to 8% of the total number of surgeries. A meta-analysis of prevalence was performed, only with the retrospective studies. It was observed that the effectiveness rate of premaxilla repositioning was 92%, with a CI between 0.04 and 0.13, with all included studies showing a similar failure rate (0.08-0.09). The included studies also showed great homogeneity in this analysis (I2 = 0%; P = .75).
CONCLUSION: Although there are several alternatives and techniques for repositioning and stabilizing the premaxilla, the statistical result did not differ between the different techniques.