The pattern of infertility diagnoses in women of advanced reproductive age.

OBJECTIVE

Our intention was to determine whether there is a unique pattern of infertility diagnoses in older infertile couples.

STUDY

DESIGN

The design of this study was a retrospective chart review study. It was performed in a tertiary referral reproductive medicine unit. There were 2 groups of patients-couples: group 1, female partner aged 20-29 (n = 105) at presentation; group 2, female partner aged 40-45 (n = 112) at presentation. All women underwent infertility evaluations between 1989 and 1994. There were no interventions. The prevalence of standard infertility diagnoses was the main outcome measure.

RESULTS

The prevalence of 8 major infertility diagnoses in the younger and older groups (each couple could have >/=1 diagnosis) was as follows: (1) ovulatory factor-younger group, 56%; older group, 30%; (2) tubal factor-younger group, 34%; older group, 29%; (3) endometriosis-younger group, 13%; older group, 17%; (4) uterine factor-younger group, 1%; older group, 5%; (5) cervical factor-younger group, 4%; older group, 1%; (6) luteal deficiency-younger group, 4%; older group, 10%; (7) male factor-younger group, 32%; older group, 45%; (8) unexplained-younger group, 5%; older group, 10%. The only significant difference was an increase in ovulatory factor in the younger group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no unique pattern of infertility diagnoses in women of advanced reproductive age as seen at a tertiary referral center. We speculate that a high false-positive rate associated with standard infertility tests and a different referral pattern for older couples obscures any real differences in the etiology of infertility in older couples.