MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.039

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2019

Histologic correlation between smartphone and coloposcopic findings in patients with abnormal cervical cytology: experiences in a tertiary referral hospital.

Tanaka Yusuke, Ueda Yutaka, Kakubari Reisa, Kakuda Mamoru, Kubota Satoshi, Matsuzaki Satoko, Okazawa Akiko, Egawa-Takata Tomomi, Matsuzaki Shinya, Kobayashi Eiji, Kimura Tadashi

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяVideo-Audio MediaПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Smartphones recently have been applied in the medical setting. However, the literature evaluating the utility of smartphones in gynecologic oncology is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of a smartphone in the detection of uterine cervical lesions in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.

STUDY

DESIGN

Seventy-five women with abnormal cervical cytology were enrolled. Two doctors independently inspected the uterine cervix by using smartphone or colposcopy. Images were captured using acetic acid, and biopsies were taken as standard-of-care procedures. The diagnostic performance of the smartphone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasm 1 or worse and cervical intraepithelial neoplasm 2 or worse were evaluated, and the kappa value was calculated to determine the chance corrected agreement of the histologic diagnoses based on the smartphone and colposcopic findings.

RESULTS

There was a substantial agreement between histologic diagnoses based on the smartphone and colposcopic findings, with a kappa value of 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.90). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the smartphone in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasm 1 or worse were 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.96), 0.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.70), 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.97), and 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.65), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasm 2 or worse were 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.98), 0.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.45), 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.81), and 0.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.88), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found that there was a substantial agreement between the histologic diagnoses based on the smartphone and colposcopic findings. The smartphone seems to be useful and may be an alternative to colposcopy.

Для цитирования: Tanaka Yusuke, Ueda Yutaka, Kakubari Reisa, Kakuda Mamoru, Kubota Satoshi, Matsuzaki Satoko, Okazawa Akiko, Egawa-Takata Tomomi, Matsuzaki Shinya, Kobayashi Eiji, Kimura Tadashi. Histologic correlation between smartphone and coloposcopic findings in patients with abnormal cervical cytology: experiences in a tertiary referral hospital.. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.039.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.