MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2310/7750.2014.13215

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery · 2015

Polysensitization in recurrent lip dermatitis.

Geda Yonas E, Boeve Bradley F, Negash Selam, Graff-Radford Neill R, Knopman David S, Parisi Joseph E, Dickson Dennis W, Petersen Ronald C

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), polysensitization consists of positive patch test reactions to three or more unrelated allergens.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this case report is to document a 27-year-old female with recurrent lip dermatitis, polysensitization, and reactions to a number of clinically relevant exposures.

METHODS

Patch testing results revealed positive reactions to tixocortol-21-pivalate (3+), lanolin (3+), neomycin (3+), nickel (1+), hydroxyethyl methylacrylate (3+), bacitracin (3+), and abitol (3+).

RESULTS

The patient had seven positive reactions, meeting the criteria for polysensitization. Of known clinical relevance, the patient had applied lanolin-containing lip balms and hydrocortisone- and bacitracin-containing products to the lips, all of which she was strongly reactive to on patch testing.

CONCLUSION

Polysensitization occurs when three or more unrelated allergens are positive on patch testing. This case highlights the importance of considering polysensitization in ACD as numerous allergens that were positive on patch testing were clinically relevant.

Для цитирования: Geda Yonas E, Boeve Bradley F, Negash Selam, Graff-Radford Neill R, Knopman David S, Parisi Joseph E, Dickson Dennis W, Petersen Ronald C. Polysensitization in recurrent lip dermatitis.. Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.2310/7750.2014.13215.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.