Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2019
Immediately restored single implants in the aesthetic zone of the maxilla using a novel design: 5-year results from a prospective single-arm clinical trial.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ma Sunyoung, Tawse-Smith Andrew, Brown Simon D K, Duncan Warwick
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Single implant crowns have become the preferred rehabilitation treatment option for replacing a missing tooth.
PURPOSE: This study evaluates 5-year clinical success of using tilted implants placed immediately after extraction followed by rehabilitation with all-ceramic crowns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven participants requiring 28 single implant crowns in the aesthetic zone of maxilla were recruited to participate in a single-arm clinical trial. All participants were rehabilitated according to immediate implant placement using CP grade 4 titanium implants with roughened surfaces and a 12°-angled platform. Provisional implant crowns were connected within 4 hours of implant placement and loaded according to progressive loading protocol. At 8 weeks (baseline), definitive screw-retained crowns fabricated using densely sintered zirconia abutments with the veneering porcelain were delivered. Participants were followed up to 5 years and 16 participants with 17 single implant crowns attended Year 5 recall. Data collection included changes in marginal bone levels (MBLs), mid-buccal mucosal levels (MBMLs), implant stability quotient (ISQ) values, and any prosthodontic maintenance issues.
RESULTS: The mean changes in MBLs at each recall was bone fill of 0.5 ± 1.18 mm (surgery-baseline), increase of 0.1 ± 0.57 mm (baseline-Year 1), and marginal bone loss of 0.1 ± 0.25 mm (Years 1-5). A minimal change occurred with the MBMLs during the observation period. The mean ISQ value at each time point increased from 65.1 (implant placement), to 67.4 (baseline) and 69.9 (Years 1 and 5). Prosthodontic maintenance issues occurred only during the first year which included fracture of veneering ceramic and zirconia abutment as well as aesthetic concerns.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the data collected would suggest that replacing a single missing tooth using titanium oral implants with 12° platform tilt and zirconia abutments can be a successful rehabilitation option in the esthetically demanding zone of anterior maxilla.
PURPOSE: This study evaluates 5-year clinical success of using tilted implants placed immediately after extraction followed by rehabilitation with all-ceramic crowns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven participants requiring 28 single implant crowns in the aesthetic zone of maxilla were recruited to participate in a single-arm clinical trial. All participants were rehabilitated according to immediate implant placement using CP grade 4 titanium implants with roughened surfaces and a 12°-angled platform. Provisional implant crowns were connected within 4 hours of implant placement and loaded according to progressive loading protocol. At 8 weeks (baseline), definitive screw-retained crowns fabricated using densely sintered zirconia abutments with the veneering porcelain were delivered. Participants were followed up to 5 years and 16 participants with 17 single implant crowns attended Year 5 recall. Data collection included changes in marginal bone levels (MBLs), mid-buccal mucosal levels (MBMLs), implant stability quotient (ISQ) values, and any prosthodontic maintenance issues.
RESULTS: The mean changes in MBLs at each recall was bone fill of 0.5 ± 1.18 mm (surgery-baseline), increase of 0.1 ± 0.57 mm (baseline-Year 1), and marginal bone loss of 0.1 ± 0.25 mm (Years 1-5). A minimal change occurred with the MBMLs during the observation period. The mean ISQ value at each time point increased from 65.1 (implant placement), to 67.4 (baseline) and 69.9 (Years 1 and 5). Prosthodontic maintenance issues occurred only during the first year which included fracture of veneering ceramic and zirconia abutment as well as aesthetic concerns.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the data collected would suggest that replacing a single missing tooth using titanium oral implants with 12° platform tilt and zirconia abutments can be a successful rehabilitation option in the esthetically demanding zone of anterior maxilla.