Immunobiology · 2022
Optimized outcome prediction of oncogenetic mutations in non-early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peng Li-Jun, Wang Si-Si, Guo Shan-Shan, Zhang Jiao-Jiao, Liu Yuan-Fang, Rousseaux Sophie, Khochbin Saadi, Chen Bing, Wang Jin, Mi Jian-Qing
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Early biomarkers allowing effective treatment stratification in adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) patients remain elusive.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mutation spectrum of 116T-ALL adult patients enrolled in the Shanghai Institute of Hematology (SIH)-based hospital network or Multicenter Hematology-Oncology Protocols Evaluation System (M-HOPES) in China were studied by using RNA-sequencing or targeted next generation sequencing. A comprehensive survival analysis based on clinical characteristics, immunophenotype and oncogenetic classifier was performed.
RESULTS: Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) has higher mutation rates of N/K-RAS and lower mutation rates of FBXW7 compared to non-ETP ALL, but the survival probability of ETP-ALL patients is similar to that of non-ETP ALL patients. T-ALLs with a NOTCH1/FBXW7 (N/F) mutation in the absence of RAS or PTEN abnormalities (NFRP class I) show a more favorable outcome compared to T-ALLs with no N/F mutation and/or with the presence of RAS/PTEN alterations (NFRP class II). A survival analysis of T-ALL, taking into account both the ETP-ALL/non-ETP T-ALL groups and the NFRP oncogenetic classifier, demonstrates that, within the non-ETP T-ALL subtype, NFRP class II identifies a group with poor prognosis and significant decreases of both OS (14.8% versus 50.9%, P = 0.019) and EFS (11.4% versus 42.4%, P = 0.001). In contrast, no survival difference is observed within ETP-ALL between the NFRP class I or class II (OS: 37.9% versus 33%, P = 0.876; EFS: 39.8% versus 33.7%, P = 0.969).
CONCLUSION: In summary, the oncogenetic classifier based on the NFRP classes is particularly useful to improve the stratification of non-ETP ALL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mutation spectrum of 116T-ALL adult patients enrolled in the Shanghai Institute of Hematology (SIH)-based hospital network or Multicenter Hematology-Oncology Protocols Evaluation System (M-HOPES) in China were studied by using RNA-sequencing or targeted next generation sequencing. A comprehensive survival analysis based on clinical characteristics, immunophenotype and oncogenetic classifier was performed.
RESULTS: Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) has higher mutation rates of N/K-RAS and lower mutation rates of FBXW7 compared to non-ETP ALL, but the survival probability of ETP-ALL patients is similar to that of non-ETP ALL patients. T-ALLs with a NOTCH1/FBXW7 (N/F) mutation in the absence of RAS or PTEN abnormalities (NFRP class I) show a more favorable outcome compared to T-ALLs with no N/F mutation and/or with the presence of RAS/PTEN alterations (NFRP class II). A survival analysis of T-ALL, taking into account both the ETP-ALL/non-ETP T-ALL groups and the NFRP oncogenetic classifier, demonstrates that, within the non-ETP T-ALL subtype, NFRP class II identifies a group with poor prognosis and significant decreases of both OS (14.8% versus 50.9%, P = 0.019) and EFS (11.4% versus 42.4%, P = 0.001). In contrast, no survival difference is observed within ETP-ALL between the NFRP class I or class II (OS: 37.9% versus 33%, P = 0.876; EFS: 39.8% versus 33.7%, P = 0.969).
CONCLUSION: In summary, the oncogenetic classifier based on the NFRP classes is particularly useful to improve the stratification of non-ETP ALL.