MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3928/00220124-20260414-02

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of continuing education in nursing · 2026

First Years in Nursing: Relationship and Risk Factors Between Reality Shock and Attitudes Toward Medical Errors.

Harman Duru Berra, Doğan Muzaffer Berna

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study examined the relationship between reality shock and attitudes toward medical errors in newly graduated nurses.

METHOD: A descriptive and correlational design was used. Data were obtained from 300 nurses with 3 to 24 months of experience. Information was collected with the personal information form, Reality Shock Scale, and Medical Error Attitude Scale.

RESULTS

Reality shock was positively correlated with medical error perception (cognitive perception of medical errors), approach, and reasons. Higher Reality Shock Scale scores were associated with unwillingness to work in clinics, mixed shifts, dissatisfaction, and limited support. Scores on the Medical Error Attitude Scale were positively related to professional knowledge and responsibility. Working in university or emergency settings and reporting all errors improved attitudes, whereas mixed shifts and heavy workloads reduced attitudes.

CONCLUSION

For new nurses, reality shock negatively affects error awareness (sensitivity to error-related situations in practice) and willingness to report errors. Supportive education and mentorship can ease this transition and encourage a culture of error reporting.

Для цитирования: Harman Duru Berra, Doğan Muzaffer Berna. First Years in Nursing: Relationship and Risk Factors Between Reality Shock and Attitudes Toward Medical Errors.. Journal of continuing education in nursing. 2026. DOI: 10.3928/00220124-20260414-02.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.