MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90030-7

Медицинская библиотека · Urology · 1989

Intracavernous injections of papaverine and phentolamine: correlation with penile brachial index.

Lakin M M, Montague D K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Eighty-two patients were evaluated for erectile failure with a comprehensive history, physical examination, hormonal testing, noninvasive Doppler examination (PBI), and nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT). After these studies all patients received intracavernous injection with a combination of papaverine (50 mg) and phentolamine (1.66 mg), and both tumescence and rigidity were monitored. Rigidity response was compared with the PBI. The number of patients with a poor rigidity response in each PBI category were: 3 of 5 with a PBI of less than 0.6 (vasculogenic), 7 of 11 with a PBI of 0.6-0.75 (ambiguous), and 25 of 66 with a PBI of 0.75-1.0 (normal). These results indicate only a marginally significant association between PBI and intracavernous injection. The procedure was safe with no long-term sequelae from injection observed, and no surgical intervention was required. Complications of injections included reversible priapism in 11 patients (13.4%), transient dizziness in 10 patients (12.2%), and hematoma in 5 patients (6.2%). This study suggests that intracavernous injection with a drug combination may be a more sensitive screening test for vasculogenic impotence than noninvasive Doppler studies because it more closely simulates the erectile response.

Для цитирования: Lakin M M, Montague D K. Intracavernous injections of papaverine and phentolamine: correlation with penile brachial index.. Urology. 1989. DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90030-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.