Journal of diabetes · 2023
Long noncoding RNAs as potential diagnostic biomarkers for diabetes mellitus and complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Su Xuee, Huang Huibin, Lai Jinqing, Lin Shu, Huang Yinqiong
Аннотация
AIMS: Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) may be associated with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications; however, the findings remain controversial. We aimed to synthesize the available data to assess the diagnostic utility of lncRNAs for identification of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its consequences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for articles published from September 11, 2015 to December 27, 2022. We evaluated human case-control or cohort studies on differential lncRNA expression in type 2 diabetes mellitus or its associated comorbidities. We excluded studies if they were non-peer reviewed or published in languages other than English. From 2387 identified studies, we included 17 (4685 participants).
RESULTS: Analysis of the pooled data showed that lncRNAs had a diagnostic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.87), with a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.83) and a specificity of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.80). LncRNAs had an AUC of 0.65 for the diagnosis of prediabetes, with 82% sensitivity and 65% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: LncRNAs may be promising diagnostic markers for type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for articles published from September 11, 2015 to December 27, 2022. We evaluated human case-control or cohort studies on differential lncRNA expression in type 2 diabetes mellitus or its associated comorbidities. We excluded studies if they were non-peer reviewed or published in languages other than English. From 2387 identified studies, we included 17 (4685 participants).
RESULTS: Analysis of the pooled data showed that lncRNAs had a diagnostic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.87), with a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.83) and a specificity of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.80). LncRNAs had an AUC of 0.65 for the diagnosis of prediabetes, with 82% sensitivity and 65% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: LncRNAs may be promising diagnostic markers for type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications.