[Correlation between subjective evaluation and objective examination in patient with fungal rhino-sinusitis].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The study was to evaluate the quality of life in patients with fungal rhino-sinusitis(FRS) and to investigate the relationship between different subjective tests.objective measures and that between subjective tests and objective measures.
METHOD: Quantitative data of 18 preoperative recruits with FRS were collected by using sino-nasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20) and then the SNOT-20 items were categorized into five domains, a visual analogue scale (VAS). Lund-Kennedy endoscopy staging system and the Lund-Mackay CT staging system. Correlation among these data was analyzed.
RESULT: The six highest score items in SNOT-20 were Facial pain/pressure, Thick nasal discharge, Need to blow nose, Sneezing, Fatigue, and Frustrated/restless/irritable. The total SNOT-20 score was not correlated with the other objective or subjective tests(P > 0.05). However, there was significant correlation between SNOT-20 nasal symptom domain and Lund-Mackay T score( r = 0.605, P < 0.01), as well as between SNOT-20 sleep related symptom domain and VAS (r = 0.605, P = 0.008). Significant correlation was found between the Lund-Mackay CT staging and the VAS (r = 0.6150, P < 0.01), as well as between the Lund-Mackay CT staging and the Lund-Kennedy endoscopy staging (r = 0.5001 P < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between Lund Kennedy endoscopy staging and the patient-based questionnaires (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The objective measures were correlated well with each other and CT staging had significant correlation with the SNOT-20 nasal symptom domain and VAS. There was also significant correlation between SNOT-20 sleep related symptom domain and VAS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.