The Chinese journal of dental research · 2025
Impact of Nanofiller Fractions on Selected Properties of Microfilled Composite Resin.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Parpo Enni, Lassila Lippo, Vallittu Pekka K, Garoushi Sufyan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of incorporating various weight fractions of nanometre-sized particulate fillers on specific properties of microfilled composite resin.
METHODS: Microfilled composite resin was prepared by mixing 29 wt.% of resin matrix (BisGMA/TEGDMA) with the 71 wt.% of silane treated particulate fillers (Ø 0.4 µm). Then, various fractions of nanometre-sized (180 nm) fillers (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 wt.%) were added gradually using a high-speed mixing machine. For each composite resin, flexural properties (n = 8) were evaluated using a three-point bending test on a universal testing machine (ISO standard 4049). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)-spectrometry was used to calculate the degree of monomer conversion (DC%). Surface microhardess (Vickers) was also determined. Surface gloss was measured before and after polishing (4,000-grit paper). A two-body wear test was performed in a ball-on-flat configuration using a chewing simulator with 15,000 cycles. A non-contact 3D optical profilometer was utilised to measure wear depth. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to interpret the results statistically, then a post hoc Tukey analysis was performed.
RESULTS: ANOVA revealed that the fraction of nanofillers had a significant effect (P 0.05) on flexural modulus, DC%, microhardness, gloss and wear depth. The group without nanofillers showed the highest DC% (56.6%), gloss after polishing (76.2 GU) and wear resistance (24.2 µm) values, whereas the group with 35 wt.% of nanofillers had the highest flexural modulus (9 GPa) and microhardness (70 VH).
CONCLUSION: It is beneficial to add nanofillers to microfilled composite resin; however, it is essential to assess the proportion ratio carefully. Optimising all the properties of composite resin at once with just one formulation is challenging.
METHODS: Microfilled composite resin was prepared by mixing 29 wt.% of resin matrix (BisGMA/TEGDMA) with the 71 wt.% of silane treated particulate fillers (Ø 0.4 µm). Then, various fractions of nanometre-sized (180 nm) fillers (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 wt.%) were added gradually using a high-speed mixing machine. For each composite resin, flexural properties (n = 8) were evaluated using a three-point bending test on a universal testing machine (ISO standard 4049). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)-spectrometry was used to calculate the degree of monomer conversion (DC%). Surface microhardess (Vickers) was also determined. Surface gloss was measured before and after polishing (4,000-grit paper). A two-body wear test was performed in a ball-on-flat configuration using a chewing simulator with 15,000 cycles. A non-contact 3D optical profilometer was utilised to measure wear depth. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to interpret the results statistically, then a post hoc Tukey analysis was performed.
RESULTS: ANOVA revealed that the fraction of nanofillers had a significant effect (P 0.05) on flexural modulus, DC%, microhardness, gloss and wear depth. The group without nanofillers showed the highest DC% (56.6%), gloss after polishing (76.2 GU) and wear resistance (24.2 µm) values, whereas the group with 35 wt.% of nanofillers had the highest flexural modulus (9 GPa) and microhardness (70 VH).
CONCLUSION: It is beneficial to add nanofillers to microfilled composite resin; however, it is essential to assess the proportion ratio carefully. Optimising all the properties of composite resin at once with just one formulation is challenging.