DOI 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2020.05.051
[Genotyping for Auxiliary Identification of Anti-C Alloantibody with Anti-f Autoantibody Mimicking Alloantibody].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To identify the difficult antibody specificity of 1 PNH patient with blood transfusion history by genotyping.
METHODS
RH typing of this patient was performed using gel card method, the antibody specificity was identified by panel cells, the RH-unrelated phenotype were excluded by genotyping method in difficult condition of serologic identification, furthmore different RH phenotype cells were used for adsorption-elution so as to re-examine the reactivity of antibodies in this patient's serum, and finally different RH phenotype cells were combined to exclude other unrelated antibodies.
RESULTS
The RH phenotype presented as double population for C antigen, and positive agglutination for the other antigens. The results of RHD zygote, together with RHD and RHCE sequencing showed that the RHD genotype was homozygous RHD/RHD, and the c.122A>G mutation did not found in RHCE gene, thus CW antigen was excluded; 48G lies in the 1st exon, the 5th exon showed nt676 G/C heterozygosity, the 2nd-4th, 6th-10th exons did not show mutations, however a new mutation was found in the 4th intron IVS4+29A>C. It can be judged that the RH genotype was Dce/DcE, and its phenotype should be ccDEe. The anti-C alloantibody and rare anti-f autoantibody mimicking alloantibody in serum was determined by different RH phenotypic cell absorption-elution. Finally, cross-matched AB ccDEE blood units were selected for the patient and there was no adverse reactions of blood transfusion occurred.
CONCLUSION
Genotyping can be auxiliarily applied to the identification of difficult antibodies in serum of a patient, thereby reducing the risk of blood transfusion.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.