The Journal of urology · 2014
Long-term followup and deterioration rate of anterior substitution urethroplasty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barbagli Guido, Kulkarni Sanjay B, Fossati Nicola, Larcher Alessandro, Sansalone Salvatore, Guazzoni Giorgio, Romano Giuseppe, Pankaj Joshi M, Dell'Acqua Vincenzo, Lazzeri Massimo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We investigated deterioration of the success rate of penile and bulbar substitution urethroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective descriptive analysis of patients who underwent substitution urethroplasty between July 1994 and September 2007. Inclusion criteria included 1-stage anterior urethroplasty using penile skin or oral mucosa with a minimum of 6 years followup. Patients with posterior urethral stricture, failed hypospadias or incomplete clinical records were excluded from analysis. The primary study outcome was postoperative failure-free survival and the secondary outcome was to identify significant predictors of treatment failure. The clinical outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative instrumentation was needed. Descriptive statistical analysis was done as well as Kaplan-Meier analysis, and univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 359 patients were included in study. Median followup was 118 months. Of the procedures 265 (73.8%) were successful and 94 (26.2%) failed, including 91 (96.8%) within the first 5 years. Substitute tissue type (oral mucosa vs skin) was the only significant predictor on univariable analysis (HR 1.86, p = 0.005). This result was confirmed by multivariable analysis adjusting for age at surgery, stricture length and etiology, urethroplasty type and previous treatments (HR 2.26, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Deterioration after anterior 1-stage substitution urethroplasty seems to develop within the first 5 years. Oral mucosa showed greater failure-free survival than penile skin and 1-stage penile urethroplasty showed the same success rate as bulbar urethroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective descriptive analysis of patients who underwent substitution urethroplasty between July 1994 and September 2007. Inclusion criteria included 1-stage anterior urethroplasty using penile skin or oral mucosa with a minimum of 6 years followup. Patients with posterior urethral stricture, failed hypospadias or incomplete clinical records were excluded from analysis. The primary study outcome was postoperative failure-free survival and the secondary outcome was to identify significant predictors of treatment failure. The clinical outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative instrumentation was needed. Descriptive statistical analysis was done as well as Kaplan-Meier analysis, and univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 359 patients were included in study. Median followup was 118 months. Of the procedures 265 (73.8%) were successful and 94 (26.2%) failed, including 91 (96.8%) within the first 5 years. Substitute tissue type (oral mucosa vs skin) was the only significant predictor on univariable analysis (HR 1.86, p = 0.005). This result was confirmed by multivariable analysis adjusting for age at surgery, stricture length and etiology, urethroplasty type and previous treatments (HR 2.26, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Deterioration after anterior 1-stage substitution urethroplasty seems to develop within the first 5 years. Oral mucosa showed greater failure-free survival than penile skin and 1-stage penile urethroplasty showed the same success rate as bulbar urethroplasty.