Transfusion · 1996
Anaphylaxis after treatment with recombinant factor VIII.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shopnick R I, Kazemi M, Brettler D B, Buckwalter C, Yang L, Bray G, Gomperts E D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Treatment of hemophilia patients with recombinant factor VIII concentrates has not previously been associated with anaphylaxis.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 5-week-old boy with severe hemophilia A developed dyspnea, cyanosis, hypotension, and a diffuse urticarial rash following treatment with a recombinant factor VIII (Recombinate). To identify the cause of anaphylaxis in this patient, the vial lot was examined for the presence of endotoxin, and a checkerboard immunoblotting technique was used to test serum and/or plasma samples from the patient and mother for the presence of antibodies (IgA, IgG, IgE, and IgM) to Recombinate-related antigens (recombinant factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, human serum albumin, Chinese hamster ovary proteins, bovine serum albumin, mouse monoclonal anti-human factor VIII, polyethylene glycol 3350), and to ethylene oxide, the agent used to sterilize the infusion equipment.
RESULTS: No immune response directed against the Recombinate-related antigens or ethylene oxide that could be associated with the anaphylactic reaction was identified. Endotoxin was not present upon rabbit pyrogen testing of the therapeutic product.
CONCLUSION: These studies failed to show any association between Recombinate and the onset of the allergic reaction. This seems to be the first reported case of anaphylaxis following the infusion of a recombinant form of factor VIII concentrate.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 5-week-old boy with severe hemophilia A developed dyspnea, cyanosis, hypotension, and a diffuse urticarial rash following treatment with a recombinant factor VIII (Recombinate). To identify the cause of anaphylaxis in this patient, the vial lot was examined for the presence of endotoxin, and a checkerboard immunoblotting technique was used to test serum and/or plasma samples from the patient and mother for the presence of antibodies (IgA, IgG, IgE, and IgM) to Recombinate-related antigens (recombinant factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, human serum albumin, Chinese hamster ovary proteins, bovine serum albumin, mouse monoclonal anti-human factor VIII, polyethylene glycol 3350), and to ethylene oxide, the agent used to sterilize the infusion equipment.
RESULTS: No immune response directed against the Recombinate-related antigens or ethylene oxide that could be associated with the anaphylactic reaction was identified. Endotoxin was not present upon rabbit pyrogen testing of the therapeutic product.
CONCLUSION: These studies failed to show any association between Recombinate and the onset of the allergic reaction. This seems to be the first reported case of anaphylaxis following the infusion of a recombinant form of factor VIII concentrate.