Adalimumab, Anakinra, and Tocilizumab in Patients With Noninfectious Uveitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab, anakinra, and tocilizumab in patients with active and refractory noninfectious uveitis (NIU).
DESIGN
Multicenter, Bayesian, randomized controlled trial.
SUBJECTS: A total of 112 patients with active, noninfectious, nonanterior uveitis across 27 French centers were enrolled.
METHODS
Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either subcutaneous adalimumab (n = 44; initial dose 80 mg, followed by 40 mg every other week), anakinra (n = 18; 100 mg daily), or tocilizumab (n = 50; 162 mg weekly) for a 16-week treatment period.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was a reduction of at least 2 steps on the Miami 9-step scale for vitreous haze with a corticosteroid dose of 0.1 mg/kg/d or less at week 16.
RESULTS
During interim analyses, anakinra was shown to be ineffective, and this arm was stopped prematurely. By week 16, the primary outcome was achieved in 7 of 44 (16%) and 7 of 50 (14%) patients in the adalimumab and tocilizumab groups, respectively (mean difference -2.0%, 95% credible interval [CrI] -16.8% to +12.3%). Absence of macular edema and retinal vasculitis was seen in 54% and 56%, and in 59% and 57%, respectively (mean differences -2.0% [95% CrI, -14% to +26%] and 2.0% [95% CrI, -31% to +15%]). A prednisone taper to ≤0.1 mg/kg/d at week 16 was reached by 59% and 74% of patients, respectively (mean difference -15%, 95% CrI -4% to +32%). Mild to moderate adverse events occurred in 43% (adalimumab) and 54% (tocilizumab).
CONCLUSIONS
Adalimumab and tocilizumab show comparable efficacy in active, refractory NIU, whereas anakinra was ineffective.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02929251.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.