DOI 10.1016/j.jormas.2026.102934
Global research trends and future perspectives in salivary gland oncology: A scientometric evaluation.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Salivary gland tumors (SGTs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with diverse histopathological and molecular features.
AIM: This study aims to provide a comprehensive bibliometric overview of global research trends, key contributors, and thematic developments in salivary gland oncology.
METHODS
A total of 2932 relevant publications were retrieved from the Scopus database and analyzed using Bibliometrix (R package) and VOSviewer. The analysis examined publication trends, citation metrics, collaborative networks, keyword co-occurrence, and thematic evolution. Bibliographic coupling and co-citation analyses were conducted to identify influential research topics and author collaborations.
RESULTS
Research output steadily increased over the past two decades, with a marked rise after 2010. The United States, Japan, and Germany were the leading contributors, supported by strong international collaborations. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre and MD Anderson Cancer Center emerged as the most productive institutions. Influential authors included Seifert G, Bishop JA, and Nagao T. Highly cited journals were Head and Neck Pathology, Histopathology, and the American Journal of Surgical Pathology. Major thematic clusters included salivary duct carcinoma, immunohistochemistry, pleomorphic adenoma, and adenoid cystic carcinoma. Notably, recent trends showed a growing focus on artificial intelligence (AI) applications and molecular profiling of SGTs.
CONCLUSION
This bibliometric analysis maps the evolving landscape of salivary gland oncology research. Emphasis should be placed on strengthening global collaborations, advancing molecular diagnostics, and leveraging AI technologies.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.