Journal of the neurological sciences · 2023
Simple quantitative planimetric measurement of nigrosome-1 for clinical settings.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chau Minh T, Agzarian Marc, Wilcox Robert A, Dwyer Andrew, Bezak Eva, Todd Gabrielle
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Loss of MRI hyperintense signal in nigrosome-1 (assessed with susceptibility-weighted imaging) is a biomarker for Parkinson's disease (PD). Current clinical practice involves subjectively rating the appearance of nigrosome-1 which is challenging. The study aimed to test and compare a simple method for quantifying nigrosome-1 with the current subjective rating method.
METHODS: Two experienced neuroradiologists measured area of hyperintense signal in nigrosome-1 (quantitative method) and rated nigrosome-1 appearance (as normal, attenuated, or absent; subjective method) in 42 patients encompassing the full spectrum of nigrosome-1 integrity (21 patients aged 55.5 ± 20.9 years with Essential tremor (ET) and a subset of 21 patients aged 69.6 ± 8.6 years with PD). Neuroradiologists were blinded to each other's measurements, clinical notes, and patient group.
RESULTS: Both methods yielded a significant difference between the groups (PD vs ET; p < 0.001). Pooled (across sides) area of nigrosome-1 hyperintense signal was significantly smaller in the PD group (median = 2.1 mm2, range = 0-15.8 mm2) than ET group (median = 8.3 mm2, range = 0-15.7 mm2; p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was high to very high for both methods (subjective: weighted kappa = 0.640, p < 0.001; quantitative: W = 0.733, p = 0.004). Our primary hypothesis that area of nigrosome-1 hyperintense signal exhibits higher inter-rater reliability than subjective rating of nigrosome-1 appearance was not supported.
CONCLUSION: The simple quantitative method, used with subjectively rated nigrosome-1 appearance, may improve confidence in longitudinal clinical reporting, when nigrosome-1 is attenuated. However, further work on the incremental diagnostic value of planimetry and bias, repeatability and reproducibility are needed before it can be recommended in clinical practice.
METHODS: Two experienced neuroradiologists measured area of hyperintense signal in nigrosome-1 (quantitative method) and rated nigrosome-1 appearance (as normal, attenuated, or absent; subjective method) in 42 patients encompassing the full spectrum of nigrosome-1 integrity (21 patients aged 55.5 ± 20.9 years with Essential tremor (ET) and a subset of 21 patients aged 69.6 ± 8.6 years with PD). Neuroradiologists were blinded to each other's measurements, clinical notes, and patient group.
RESULTS: Both methods yielded a significant difference between the groups (PD vs ET; p < 0.001). Pooled (across sides) area of nigrosome-1 hyperintense signal was significantly smaller in the PD group (median = 2.1 mm2, range = 0-15.8 mm2) than ET group (median = 8.3 mm2, range = 0-15.7 mm2; p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was high to very high for both methods (subjective: weighted kappa = 0.640, p < 0.001; quantitative: W = 0.733, p = 0.004). Our primary hypothesis that area of nigrosome-1 hyperintense signal exhibits higher inter-rater reliability than subjective rating of nigrosome-1 appearance was not supported.
CONCLUSION: The simple quantitative method, used with subjectively rated nigrosome-1 appearance, may improve confidence in longitudinal clinical reporting, when nigrosome-1 is attenuated. However, further work on the incremental diagnostic value of planimetry and bias, repeatability and reproducibility are needed before it can be recommended in clinical practice.