Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2005
Outpatient laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with assistance of the lap loop.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lieng Marit, Istre Olav, Langebrekke Anton, Jungersen Marianne, Busund Bjørn
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the safety and patient satisfaction with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) performed in an outpatient setting.
DESIGN: Prospective case study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: Public hospital.
PATIENTS: Forty-three women.
INTERVENTION: Outpatient LSH performed by lap-loop.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The procedure was recommened by 41 out of 43 patients. Three patients (7%) were admitted to the hospital due to complications after the surgery. One patient was admitted because of a vasovagal reaction after anesthesia; she recovered quickly and was discharged after a few hours of observation. One patient was admitted because of postoperative pain and discharged the next day; she had a prolonged postoperative recovery with pain and subfebrile temperature. One patient underwent laparotomy due to major intraabdominal bleeding. Postoperative complications occurred in another five patients (12%) without need for hospitalization (infected intra-abdominal hematoma, urine retention, cystitis, cystitis combined with wound infection, and pneumonia).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy as an outpatient procedure is a safe and highly acceptable treatment.
DESIGN: Prospective case study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: Public hospital.
PATIENTS: Forty-three women.
INTERVENTION: Outpatient LSH performed by lap-loop.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The procedure was recommened by 41 out of 43 patients. Three patients (7%) were admitted to the hospital due to complications after the surgery. One patient was admitted because of a vasovagal reaction after anesthesia; she recovered quickly and was discharged after a few hours of observation. One patient was admitted because of postoperative pain and discharged the next day; she had a prolonged postoperative recovery with pain and subfebrile temperature. One patient underwent laparotomy due to major intraabdominal bleeding. Postoperative complications occurred in another five patients (12%) without need for hospitalization (infected intra-abdominal hematoma, urine retention, cystitis, cystitis combined with wound infection, and pneumonia).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy as an outpatient procedure is a safe and highly acceptable treatment.