European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2016
In utero treatment of severe fetal anemia resulting from fetomaternal red blood cell incompatibility: a comparison of simple transfusion and exchange transfusion.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guilbaud Lucie, Garabedian Charles, Cortey Anne, Rakza Thameur, Carbonne Bruno, Houfflin-Debarge Véronique
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare in utero exchange transfusions (IUET) and in utero simple transfusions (IUST) for the treatment of fetal anemia resulting from red blood cell fetomaternal incompatibility.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study from January 2006 through December 2011. The two techniques were compared for effectiveness, complications, and neonatal outcomes.
RESULTS: 36 patients had 87 IUETs and 85 patients 241 IUSTs. Gestational age at the first transfusion was similar in both groups (IUET: 27±3.8 weeks; IUST: 27±4.7 weeks; NS) as was the initial fetal hemoglobin level (IUET: 6.4±2.8g/dL; IUST: 6.0±2.5g/dL; NS). No significant differences were noted for postprocedure complications or efficacy. The daily drop in hemoglobin level was similar in both groups (IUET: 0.41±0.23g/dL/day; IUST: 0.44±0.17g/dL/day; NS) as were the time intervals between two procedures. Gestational age at birth was earlier in the IUET group (34.4±1.3 weeks vs 35.5±1.8 weeks; p<0.001), but the postnatal transfusions or exchange transfusions rates and the duration of intensive phototherapy did not differ. No significant differences were noted for the overall survival rates (IUET: 100%; IUST: 96.4%; p>0.99).
CONCLUSION: IUET does not appear to provide any benefits compared with IUST, neither to be associated with a higher complication rate. The choice of the technique depends on availability of packed blood cells with high hematocrit (70-80%).
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study from January 2006 through December 2011. The two techniques were compared for effectiveness, complications, and neonatal outcomes.
RESULTS: 36 patients had 87 IUETs and 85 patients 241 IUSTs. Gestational age at the first transfusion was similar in both groups (IUET: 27±3.8 weeks; IUST: 27±4.7 weeks; NS) as was the initial fetal hemoglobin level (IUET: 6.4±2.8g/dL; IUST: 6.0±2.5g/dL; NS). No significant differences were noted for postprocedure complications or efficacy. The daily drop in hemoglobin level was similar in both groups (IUET: 0.41±0.23g/dL/day; IUST: 0.44±0.17g/dL/day; NS) as were the time intervals between two procedures. Gestational age at birth was earlier in the IUET group (34.4±1.3 weeks vs 35.5±1.8 weeks; p<0.001), but the postnatal transfusions or exchange transfusions rates and the duration of intensive phototherapy did not differ. No significant differences were noted for the overall survival rates (IUET: 100%; IUST: 96.4%; p>0.99).
CONCLUSION: IUET does not appear to provide any benefits compared with IUST, neither to be associated with a higher complication rate. The choice of the technique depends on availability of packed blood cells with high hematocrit (70-80%).