Journal of the neurological sciences · 2023
A prospective cohort study of familial versus sporadic essential tremor cases: Do clinical features evolve differently across time?
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Berry Diane S, Cosentino Stephanie, Louis Elan D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although essential tremor (ET) is often divided into familial and sporadic cases, few data compare the evolution of clinical features in these groups over time. Leveraging data from a prospective, longitudinal study, we present analyses of the evolution of a broad range of cognitive, motor (i.e., tremor, tandem gait) and other features (e.g., disability) of ET.
METHODS: Sixty-six familial and 23 sporadic ET cases completed in-home evaluations at baseline and 18, 36, and 54-month follow-ups. Assessments included detailed neuropsychological testing and videotaped neurological examinations. Analyses compared the longitudinal course of 16 clinical features in familial and sporadic cases.
RESULTS: Baseline mean age was 75.2 ± 8.8 years and mean observation period was 4.7 ± 0.3 years. Tremor onset age was lower and childhood onset more common in familial than sporadic cases (p's = 0.02). Longitudinal analyses revealed no significant differences between clinical features displayed by familial and sporadic cases, or differences between the patterns of change in clinical features observed in these groups across time. Sporadic cases' daily activity skills declined significantly, whereas familial cases' did not, p's = 0.04 and 0.34, respectively; however, this finding was non-significant when controlling for false discovery rate. Several additional non-significant trends were noted.
CONCLUSION: Familial and sporadic ET cases differed in onset age, and in the prevalence of childhood tremor onset. Although a number of interesting trends were observed, no significant differences in the evolution of clinical features over time in patients with and without a family history of ET were revealed.
METHODS: Sixty-six familial and 23 sporadic ET cases completed in-home evaluations at baseline and 18, 36, and 54-month follow-ups. Assessments included detailed neuropsychological testing and videotaped neurological examinations. Analyses compared the longitudinal course of 16 clinical features in familial and sporadic cases.
RESULTS: Baseline mean age was 75.2 ± 8.8 years and mean observation period was 4.7 ± 0.3 years. Tremor onset age was lower and childhood onset more common in familial than sporadic cases (p's = 0.02). Longitudinal analyses revealed no significant differences between clinical features displayed by familial and sporadic cases, or differences between the patterns of change in clinical features observed in these groups across time. Sporadic cases' daily activity skills declined significantly, whereas familial cases' did not, p's = 0.04 and 0.34, respectively; however, this finding was non-significant when controlling for false discovery rate. Several additional non-significant trends were noted.
CONCLUSION: Familial and sporadic ET cases differed in onset age, and in the prevalence of childhood tremor onset. Although a number of interesting trends were observed, no significant differences in the evolution of clinical features over time in patients with and without a family history of ET were revealed.