International journal of cardiology · 2024
Tolerability and effectiveness of beta-blockers in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kang Yu, Qu Nan, Zhang Zhongyin, Zhang Qing, Chen Xiaojing, Fu Michael
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to assess the tolerability of patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) to beta-blockers (BBs) and evaluate its association with adverse outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search from January 1, 2000 to October 20, 2023. Studies examining BB use and tolerance or the relationship between BB use and outcomes in patients with CA were included. Pooled adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for all-cause mortality were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models.
RESULTS: Eight observational studies involving 4002 patients with CA (87.5% with transthyretin CA [ATTR-CA] and 12.5% with immunoglobulin light chain CA [AL-CA]) were assessed. BBs were used by 52.5% of the patients. However, 26.3% of the patients discontinued BBs because of hypotension, bradycardia, or fatigue. Regarding the association between BB use and all-cause death, four studies were identified that included 2874 patients with ATTR-CA and 16 patients with AL-CA. The meta-analysis revealed no apparent relationship between BB use and all-cause mortality (pooled aHR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.40-1.51). Two studies on patients with ATTR-CA found no impact of BB use on all-cause mortality in the subgroup with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40%, but conflicting results exist for those with LVEF ≤40% (pooled aHR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.40-1.54).
CONCLUSION: The limited number of observational studies that predominantly enrolled patients with ATTR-CA showed that BBs were used in almost half of the patients with CA, with varying tolerability. However, no significant association was observed between BB use and all-cause mortality.
METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search from January 1, 2000 to October 20, 2023. Studies examining BB use and tolerance or the relationship between BB use and outcomes in patients with CA were included. Pooled adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for all-cause mortality were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models.
RESULTS: Eight observational studies involving 4002 patients with CA (87.5% with transthyretin CA [ATTR-CA] and 12.5% with immunoglobulin light chain CA [AL-CA]) were assessed. BBs were used by 52.5% of the patients. However, 26.3% of the patients discontinued BBs because of hypotension, bradycardia, or fatigue. Regarding the association between BB use and all-cause death, four studies were identified that included 2874 patients with ATTR-CA and 16 patients with AL-CA. The meta-analysis revealed no apparent relationship between BB use and all-cause mortality (pooled aHR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.40-1.51). Two studies on patients with ATTR-CA found no impact of BB use on all-cause mortality in the subgroup with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40%, but conflicting results exist for those with LVEF ≤40% (pooled aHR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.40-1.54).
CONCLUSION: The limited number of observational studies that predominantly enrolled patients with ATTR-CA showed that BBs were used in almost half of the patients with CA, with varying tolerability. However, no significant association was observed between BB use and all-cause mortality.