The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2022
Evaluation of Facial Esthetics Following NAM Versus CAD/NAM in Infants With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El-Ashmawi Noha A, Fayed Mona M Salah, El-Beialy Amr, Fares Ahmed E, Attia Khaled H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim is to compare the facial esthetics following nasoalveolar molding (NAM) versus computer-aided design NAM (CAD/NAM) in patients with bilateral cleft lip/palate (CLP).
DESIGN: The trial is a randomized comparative trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty infants with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate were recruited.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized between NAM and CAD/NAM groups. The treatment steps described by Grayson were followed for the NAM group. In the CAD/NAM group, digitized maxillary models were made to create a series of modified virtual models, which were used to fabricate the molding plates using 3-dimensional printing technology. The nasal stents were then added to the intraoral plates following the Grayson method. The study lasted for 4 months.
MAIN OUTCOMES: The assessment of the changes observed in the interlabial gap and nasolabial esthetics was done using standardized 2-dimensional photographs. The correlation between dental arch changes and extraoral facial esthetics was studied.
RESULTS: Both modalities showed improvement in nasolabial esthetics before the lip surgery. No statistically significant difference was found between NAM and CAD/NAM groups in any of the assessed variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions were effective in the management of infants with bilateral CLP.
DESIGN: The trial is a randomized comparative trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty infants with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate were recruited.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized between NAM and CAD/NAM groups. The treatment steps described by Grayson were followed for the NAM group. In the CAD/NAM group, digitized maxillary models were made to create a series of modified virtual models, which were used to fabricate the molding plates using 3-dimensional printing technology. The nasal stents were then added to the intraoral plates following the Grayson method. The study lasted for 4 months.
MAIN OUTCOMES: The assessment of the changes observed in the interlabial gap and nasolabial esthetics was done using standardized 2-dimensional photographs. The correlation between dental arch changes and extraoral facial esthetics was studied.
RESULTS: Both modalities showed improvement in nasolabial esthetics before the lip surgery. No statistically significant difference was found between NAM and CAD/NAM groups in any of the assessed variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions were effective in the management of infants with bilateral CLP.