Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2026
Expert Consensus on the Clinical Application of Artificial Iris.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yan Hua, Chen Wei, Zhao Zhenquan, Guo Tao, Li Jun, Ji Yinghong, Yang Jin, Xiao Xuan, Huang Yanming, Snyder Michael, Mayer Christian, Derveaux Thierry, Szurman Peter, Guthoff Rainer, Li Xile, Pfeifer Vladimir, Sauder Gangolf, Ao Mingxin, Chen Siyue, Zhang Haokun, Liao Mengyu, Lei Yi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To establish evidence-based guidance to standardize the clinical application of artificial iris implantation in patients with iris defects.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed following evidence-based consensus development standards. Eighteen international experts participated in a Delphi process to define six core clinical issues. Evidence was screened, extracted, evaluated and integrated. Recommendations were formulated through iterative expert review.
RESULTS: We established six key clinical issues related to artificial iris implantation and evidence-based recommendations to address critical gaps in clinical practice. Key outcomes included standardized criteria for indications, contraindications, and type of artificial iris selection, key aspects of surgeon-patient communication, surgical management principles and critical techniques, comprehensive perioperative care protocols, and strategies for managing long-term postoperative complications associated with artificial iris implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: This consensus standardizes artificial iris implantation through six evidence-based recommendations. It provides a standardized protocol for safe clinical implementation to restore visual function and cosmetic integrity in patients with iris defect.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed following evidence-based consensus development standards. Eighteen international experts participated in a Delphi process to define six core clinical issues. Evidence was screened, extracted, evaluated and integrated. Recommendations were formulated through iterative expert review.
RESULTS: We established six key clinical issues related to artificial iris implantation and evidence-based recommendations to address critical gaps in clinical practice. Key outcomes included standardized criteria for indications, contraindications, and type of artificial iris selection, key aspects of surgeon-patient communication, surgical management principles and critical techniques, comprehensive perioperative care protocols, and strategies for managing long-term postoperative complications associated with artificial iris implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: This consensus standardizes artificial iris implantation through six evidence-based recommendations. It provides a standardized protocol for safe clinical implementation to restore visual function and cosmetic integrity in patients with iris defect.