Urology · 2000
Morphologic transitions between proliferative inflammatory atrophy and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Putzi M J, De Marzo A M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To validate with an independent study that simple atrophy/postatrophic hyperplastic lesions (proliferative inflammatory atrophy [PIA]) often merge directly with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN).
METHODS: Using radical prostatectomies (n =14), all high-grade PIN and adenocarcinoma lesions were identified. We examined the two-dimensional topographic relationship between individual high-grade PIN lesions and PIA, between carcinoma lesions and PIA, and between carcinoma lesions and high-grade PIN. To reduce the possibility that high-grade PIN lesions represented intraprostatic dissemination of carcinoma, all specimens contained total carcinoma volumes of less than 0.5 cc.
RESULTS: High-grade PIN merged with PIA in 267 (42.5% of high-grade PIN lesions) of 629 lesions, was adjacent in 57 lesions (9%), was near in 233 lesions (37%), and was distant from PIA in 72 lesions (11.5%). Carcinoma did not merge with PIA; it was adjacent in 24 (30. 4%) of 79 lesions, was near in 46 lesions (58.2%), and was distant from PIA in 9 lesions (11.4%). Of 79 carcinoma lesions, 18 (23%) merged with high-grade PIN, 11 (14%) were adjacent, 26 (33%) were near, and 24 (30%) were distant from high-grade PIN. Areas of presumed low-grade PIN were often found in association with high-grade PIN and PIA.
CONCLUSIONS: Morphologic transitions between high-grade PIN and PIA occur frequently. Although the mere topographic relation of the lesions is not definitive proof of a continuum, these results are consistent with a model in which the proliferative epithelium in PIA may progress to PIN and/or adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: Using radical prostatectomies (n =14), all high-grade PIN and adenocarcinoma lesions were identified. We examined the two-dimensional topographic relationship between individual high-grade PIN lesions and PIA, between carcinoma lesions and PIA, and between carcinoma lesions and high-grade PIN. To reduce the possibility that high-grade PIN lesions represented intraprostatic dissemination of carcinoma, all specimens contained total carcinoma volumes of less than 0.5 cc.
RESULTS: High-grade PIN merged with PIA in 267 (42.5% of high-grade PIN lesions) of 629 lesions, was adjacent in 57 lesions (9%), was near in 233 lesions (37%), and was distant from PIA in 72 lesions (11.5%). Carcinoma did not merge with PIA; it was adjacent in 24 (30. 4%) of 79 lesions, was near in 46 lesions (58.2%), and was distant from PIA in 9 lesions (11.4%). Of 79 carcinoma lesions, 18 (23%) merged with high-grade PIN, 11 (14%) were adjacent, 26 (33%) were near, and 24 (30%) were distant from high-grade PIN. Areas of presumed low-grade PIN were often found in association with high-grade PIN and PIA.
CONCLUSIONS: Morphologic transitions between high-grade PIN and PIA occur frequently. Although the mere topographic relation of the lesions is not definitive proof of a continuum, these results are consistent with a model in which the proliferative epithelium in PIA may progress to PIN and/or adenocarcinoma.