Journal of tropical pediatrics · 2019
Surfactant Lung Lavage vs. Standard Care in the Treatment of Meconium Aspiration Syndrome-A Randomized Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bandiya Prathik, Nangia Sushma, Saili Arvind
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of surfactant lung lavage (SLL) on duration of respiratory support in neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty term infants with MAS who had moderate to severe respiratory distress (Downes score >4) were randomized toSLL (n = 31) or no lung lavage-NLL (n = 29). Neonates in intervention group underwent lung lavage with dilute surfactant and those in control group were managed as per unit protocol.
RESULTS: The median duration of respiratory support was 34 h in SLL group and 44 h in NLL group (p value = 0.994). The duration of oxygen therapy post-respiratory support decreased by 78% in SLL as compared with NLL group (4 vs. 18 h) (p value = 0.005). Lavage procedure was well tolerated with fall in mean heart rate by just 20/min and in mean saturation drop by just 6% during the procedure.
CONCLUSION: Lung lavage is well tolerated by neonates, but it does not alter overall duration of respiratory support.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty term infants with MAS who had moderate to severe respiratory distress (Downes score >4) were randomized toSLL (n = 31) or no lung lavage-NLL (n = 29). Neonates in intervention group underwent lung lavage with dilute surfactant and those in control group were managed as per unit protocol.
RESULTS: The median duration of respiratory support was 34 h in SLL group and 44 h in NLL group (p value = 0.994). The duration of oxygen therapy post-respiratory support decreased by 78% in SLL as compared with NLL group (4 vs. 18 h) (p value = 0.005). Lavage procedure was well tolerated with fall in mean heart rate by just 20/min and in mean saturation drop by just 6% during the procedure.
CONCLUSION: Lung lavage is well tolerated by neonates, but it does not alter overall duration of respiratory support.