American journal of hypertension · 2026
Effect of Very Low-Intensity Resistance Exercise on Aortic-Brachial Blood Pressure Disparity in Young Men.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tagawa Kaname, Hashimoto Junichiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Resistance exercise (RE) is accompanied by pronounced elevations in pulse pressure (PP) during and following exercise. Whether an increase in aortic PP during RE is mitigated by a reduction in exercise intensity remains uncertain. We examined the effects of resistance exercise at 10% and 40% one-repetition maximum on aortic PP.
METHODS: Sixteen participants performed resistance exercise to exhaustion at 10% and 40% of one-repetition maximum, along with a sham control, on separate days in a randomized controlled crossover design. Brachial pressure waveforms were recorded using the SphygmoCor XCEL device to estimate the aortic PP, forward and backward pressure amplitudes, and augmentation index both prior to resistance exercise or equivalent seated rest and at 3-min postintervention.
RESULTS: An increase in aortic PP following resistance exercise was smaller at 10% one-repetition maximum compared to 40% one-repetition maximum (P = 0.02), whereas the rise in brachial PP did not differ between these intensities. The increases in backward pressure amplitude and augmentation index were smaller at 10% one-repetition maximum (both, P < 0.05), while forward pressure amplitude remained consistent across intensities.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight disparities in postexercise PP responses between the aortic and brachial arteries, which can be attributed to differences in backward pressure amplitude. The beneficial effects of 10% one-repetition maximum resistance exercise became evident when assessing aortic pressure waveforms. To attenuate excessive increases in aortic pulsatile pressure stress during and after resistance exercise, 10% one-repetition maximum may serve as a relatively low-risk intensity.
METHODS: Sixteen participants performed resistance exercise to exhaustion at 10% and 40% of one-repetition maximum, along with a sham control, on separate days in a randomized controlled crossover design. Brachial pressure waveforms were recorded using the SphygmoCor XCEL device to estimate the aortic PP, forward and backward pressure amplitudes, and augmentation index both prior to resistance exercise or equivalent seated rest and at 3-min postintervention.
RESULTS: An increase in aortic PP following resistance exercise was smaller at 10% one-repetition maximum compared to 40% one-repetition maximum (P = 0.02), whereas the rise in brachial PP did not differ between these intensities. The increases in backward pressure amplitude and augmentation index were smaller at 10% one-repetition maximum (both, P < 0.05), while forward pressure amplitude remained consistent across intensities.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight disparities in postexercise PP responses between the aortic and brachial arteries, which can be attributed to differences in backward pressure amplitude. The beneficial effects of 10% one-repetition maximum resistance exercise became evident when assessing aortic pressure waveforms. To attenuate excessive increases in aortic pulsatile pressure stress during and after resistance exercise, 10% one-repetition maximum may serve as a relatively low-risk intensity.