MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.067

Медицинская библиотека · Injury · 2017

Ideal angle of syndesmotic screw fixation: A CT-based cross-sectional image analysis study.

Park Young Hwan, Choi Won Seok, Choi Gi Won, Kim Hak Jun

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Without clear reference, the precision of syndesmotic screw placement cannot be guaranteed and malposition of these screws leads to poor results. Therefore, to prevent malpositioning of syndesmotic screws, an improved understanding of the orientation of tibiofibular syndesmosis is essential. We analyzed cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) scans of the foot and ankle to identify precise screw positions for the treatment of syndesmotic injuries. A total of 134 calcaneal fractures with intact tibiofibular syndesmosis were enrolled in this retrospective study. We measured the angle between the perpendicular line of the second proximal phalanx and the line start apex of the lateral cortex of the fibula bisecting the tibial incisura and crossing the center of the tibia in neutral ankle joints, with the second toe positioned anteriorly using a short leg splint. The second toe was used as the reference for clarity and applicability. The ideal angle of syndesmotic screw placement in cross-sectional CT images was 18.8±5.6° (mean±standard deviation) and did not differ according to independent variables (P>0.05). In neutral ankle joints with the second toe positioned anteriorly, the ideal angle of syndesmotic screw placement is 18.8°, which is less than that currently in used in conventional methods.

Для цитирования: Park Young Hwan, Choi Won Seok, Choi Gi Won, Kim Hak Jun. Ideal angle of syndesmotic screw fixation: A CT-based cross-sectional image analysis study.. Injury. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.067.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.