Oral oncology · 2026
Positive Margin Rate Following Transoral Surgery in T2-T3 Laryngeal Carcinoma - a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dalmeijer Sebastiaan W R, Baidun Agatha S, Sjogren Elisabeth V, Dronkers Emilie A C, Keereweer Stijn
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Transoral endoscopic surgery, using either conventional laser techniques or supported by robotic assistance, represents an established treatment modality for selected patients with T2-T3 laryngeal carcinoma. The goal is complete tumor removal, as positive resection margins have been associated with worse oncological outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the positive margin rate following transoral endoscopic surgery for T2-T3 laryngeal carcinoma and to evaluate its impact on oncologic outcomes.
METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar was performed from inception through March 2025, identifying studies reporting on surgical margin status after transoral resection of T2 and/or T3 laryngeal carcinoma. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to estimate a pooled positive margin rate. The oncologic impact of margin status is presented descriptively owing to data heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies comprising 3,281 patients with T2-T3 laryngeal carcinoma met the inclusion criteria. The positive margin rate was 22.0% (95% CI 17.6 - 27.3, I2 = 83.8%) for the total T2-T3 cohort, with stratified rates of 22.4% for T2 and 30.8% for T3 tumors. Among the eight studies assessing the impact of positive margins in T2-T3 stages, three found a significant association with worse oncological outcomes. Conclusion A 22% positive margin rate was identified in T2-T3 laryngeal cancer treated with transoral endoscopic resection. However, the impact of margin status on oncological outcomes remains uncertain, largely due to challenges in sampling and histopathological assessment.
METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar was performed from inception through March 2025, identifying studies reporting on surgical margin status after transoral resection of T2 and/or T3 laryngeal carcinoma. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to estimate a pooled positive margin rate. The oncologic impact of margin status is presented descriptively owing to data heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies comprising 3,281 patients with T2-T3 laryngeal carcinoma met the inclusion criteria. The positive margin rate was 22.0% (95% CI 17.6 - 27.3, I2 = 83.8%) for the total T2-T3 cohort, with stratified rates of 22.4% for T2 and 30.8% for T3 tumors. Among the eight studies assessing the impact of positive margins in T2-T3 stages, three found a significant association with worse oncological outcomes. Conclusion A 22% positive margin rate was identified in T2-T3 laryngeal cancer treated with transoral endoscopic resection. However, the impact of margin status on oncological outcomes remains uncertain, largely due to challenges in sampling and histopathological assessment.