The clinical respiratory journal · 2012
Determinants of asthma control and quality of life in stable asthma: evaluation of two new cough provocation tests.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Purokivi Minna, Koskela Heikki, Kontra Kirsi
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Asthma control and quality of life are poorly associated with traditional asthma biomarkers.
OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we evaluated two new cough provocation tests in this respect.
METHODS: Asthma Control Questionnaire and Leicester Cough Questionnaire were completed by 36 stable asthmatics. Cough provocation tests with hypertonic saline and isocapnic hyperpnoea of dry air were performed, as well as spirometry, ambulatory peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) measurement.
RESULTS: Leicester Cough Questionnaire score correlated closely with cough responsiveness to hypertonic saline and isocapnic hyperpnoea (R = -0.66, P < 0.001 and R = -0.49, P = 0.002, respectively). Asthma Control Questionnaire score also correlated with the cough responsiveness to these tests (R = 0.52, P = 0.001 and R = 0.43, P = 0.008, respectively). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%predicted), diurnal PEF variation and eNO did not correlate with cough-related quality of life but showed some association with asthma control. There was a significant correlation between Leicester Cough Questionnaire and Asthma Control Questionnaire (R = -0.54, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Asthma control and cough-related quality of life are more closely associated with cough responsiveness to the investigated cough provocation tests than to eNO and traditional indices of bronchial obstruction. Cough is a major contributor to poor asthma control.
OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we evaluated two new cough provocation tests in this respect.
METHODS: Asthma Control Questionnaire and Leicester Cough Questionnaire were completed by 36 stable asthmatics. Cough provocation tests with hypertonic saline and isocapnic hyperpnoea of dry air were performed, as well as spirometry, ambulatory peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) measurement.
RESULTS: Leicester Cough Questionnaire score correlated closely with cough responsiveness to hypertonic saline and isocapnic hyperpnoea (R = -0.66, P < 0.001 and R = -0.49, P = 0.002, respectively). Asthma Control Questionnaire score also correlated with the cough responsiveness to these tests (R = 0.52, P = 0.001 and R = 0.43, P = 0.008, respectively). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%predicted), diurnal PEF variation and eNO did not correlate with cough-related quality of life but showed some association with asthma control. There was a significant correlation between Leicester Cough Questionnaire and Asthma Control Questionnaire (R = -0.54, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Asthma control and cough-related quality of life are more closely associated with cough responsiveness to the investigated cough provocation tests than to eNO and traditional indices of bronchial obstruction. Cough is a major contributor to poor asthma control.