Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960) · 2024
In Silico Study of New Isatin- Sulfonamide Derivatives as Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alibeg Ammar Abdul Aziz, Hussein Tuqa Salim
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Aim: To evaluate compound I, II, III, and IV's anticancer properties that have just been produced. These substances were created with the specific purpose of targeting solid tumors' carbonic anhydrase enzyme.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The chemical synthesis involved the use of 4-aminobenzenesulfonamide, Ethyl 4-aminobenzoate, isatin and its derivatives, absolute ethanol, DMF, glacial acetic acid. Docking studies were conducted using the MOE software program version 2015.10.
RESULTS: Results: Since acetazolamide and the sulfanilamide group shared the same pharmacophore, they were chosen. When compared to acetazolamide, compounds II and III produced a maximum score and an irreversible relationship.
CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Using the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) software, the binding model and two values the RMSD and S.score-are computed for newly synthesized compounds. When compared to acetazolamide, the theoretically generated compounds showed promise results with these proteins and good binding affinities with the receptor active pocket (S. score: - 6.89, -7.12, -6.75).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The chemical synthesis involved the use of 4-aminobenzenesulfonamide, Ethyl 4-aminobenzoate, isatin and its derivatives, absolute ethanol, DMF, glacial acetic acid. Docking studies were conducted using the MOE software program version 2015.10.
RESULTS: Results: Since acetazolamide and the sulfanilamide group shared the same pharmacophore, they were chosen. When compared to acetazolamide, compounds II and III produced a maximum score and an irreversible relationship.
CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Using the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) software, the binding model and two values the RMSD and S.score-are computed for newly synthesized compounds. When compared to acetazolamide, the theoretically generated compounds showed promise results with these proteins and good binding affinities with the receptor active pocket (S. score: - 6.89, -7.12, -6.75).