Journal of prosthodontic research · 2025
Influence of material and tightening torque on the subsidence of implant scan bodies.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Morita Daiki, Matsuzaki Tatsuya, Sakai Nobuo, Ogino Yoichiro, Atsuta Ikiru, Ayukawa Yasunori
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare abutment and scan body subsidence and determine the appropriate tightening torque value for a scan body that can accurately replicate abutment subsidence.
METHODS: An internally tapered connection implant was placed in a bone model. The titanium abutment (Ti Abut), polyetheretherketone scan body (PEEK SB), and titanium scan body (Ti SB) were tightened to torque values of 10 or 35 Ncm, with the 10 Ncm models used as reference models. Both the 10 and 35 Ncm models were scanned using a laboratory scanner. The vertical displacements of the Ti Abut, PEEK SB, and Ti SB at each torque value were determined using three-dimensional analysis software.
RESULTS: Upon tightening the scan bodies and abutment to 35 Ncm, the displacement was significantly greater than when tightened to 10 Ncm (P < 0.01). At 35 Ncm, Ti SB and Ti Abut showed significantly greater displacements than PEEK SB, whereas no significant difference was observed between Ti SB and Ti Abut.
CONCLUSIONS: The titanium scan bodies, when tightened at 35 Ncm, accurately replicated titanium abutment subsidence, unlike the PEEK scan bodies.
METHODS: An internally tapered connection implant was placed in a bone model. The titanium abutment (Ti Abut), polyetheretherketone scan body (PEEK SB), and titanium scan body (Ti SB) were tightened to torque values of 10 or 35 Ncm, with the 10 Ncm models used as reference models. Both the 10 and 35 Ncm models were scanned using a laboratory scanner. The vertical displacements of the Ti Abut, PEEK SB, and Ti SB at each torque value were determined using three-dimensional analysis software.
RESULTS: Upon tightening the scan bodies and abutment to 35 Ncm, the displacement was significantly greater than when tightened to 10 Ncm (P < 0.01). At 35 Ncm, Ti SB and Ti Abut showed significantly greater displacements than PEEK SB, whereas no significant difference was observed between Ti SB and Ti Abut.
CONCLUSIONS: The titanium scan bodies, when tightened at 35 Ncm, accurately replicated titanium abutment subsidence, unlike the PEEK scan bodies.