Obstetrics and gynecology · 1994
Gastroschisis: can antenatal ultrasound predict infant outcomes?
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pryde P G, Bardicef M, Treadwell M C, Klein M, Isada N B, Evans M I
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To test previously proposed but unproven antenatal ultrasound prognostic criteria in fetal gastroschisis.
METHODS: Thirty consecutive gastroschisis-affected pregnancies and their outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Data were tabulated by review of antenatal ultrasound videotapes, with blinded comparison to indicators of short- and long-term infant outcomes obtained from the medical records. Criteria of previous reports were applied to these data, focusing on their ability to prognosticate effectively.
RESULTS: Applying a criterion of 10 mm bowel dilatation proved minimally useful in prognosticating infant outcomes. However, a stricter 17-mm criterion for clinically important bowel dilatation provided prognostic information, with remarkable improvement in specificity (75 versus 37%) and positive predictive value (55 versus 37%) for infant morbidity, with comparatively little loss of sensitivity (71 versus 85%).
CONCLUSIONS: Bowel dilated more than 17 mm on antenatal ultrasound appears to be associated with increased short- and long-term infant morbidity. Whether this finding warrants obstetric intervention in the preterm gastroschisis-affected pregnancy with substantial bowel dilatation remains to be determined.
METHODS: Thirty consecutive gastroschisis-affected pregnancies and their outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Data were tabulated by review of antenatal ultrasound videotapes, with blinded comparison to indicators of short- and long-term infant outcomes obtained from the medical records. Criteria of previous reports were applied to these data, focusing on their ability to prognosticate effectively.
RESULTS: Applying a criterion of 10 mm bowel dilatation proved minimally useful in prognosticating infant outcomes. However, a stricter 17-mm criterion for clinically important bowel dilatation provided prognostic information, with remarkable improvement in specificity (75 versus 37%) and positive predictive value (55 versus 37%) for infant morbidity, with comparatively little loss of sensitivity (71 versus 85%).
CONCLUSIONS: Bowel dilated more than 17 mm on antenatal ultrasound appears to be associated with increased short- and long-term infant morbidity. Whether this finding warrants obstetric intervention in the preterm gastroschisis-affected pregnancy with substantial bowel dilatation remains to be determined.