MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00918369.2025.2460974

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of homosexuality · 2025

The Complex Intersection Between Autism, Prejudice and the LGBTQIA+ Movement: An Analysis of an Excerpt from the Series "The Good Doctor".

Machado Silva Heslley

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In contemporary culture, digital content like social media videos and TV series shape social perceptions, sometimes with negative impacts, particularly in countries like Brazil. The series The Good Doctor exemplifies this, with an episode exploring sexuality and diversity through the lens of an autistic doctor. The character's rigid belief in binary sexes (XX and XY) and his ignorance of conditions like Klinefelter's and Morris syndromes reflect a narrow perspective. A confrontational dialog highlights his lack of empathy, which contrasts with his efforts to challenge autism stigmas. Conservative groups exploited this episode to align with radical narratives perpetuating LGBTQIA+ stigmas, despite the character's ignorance being unintentional. The discovery of testicular cancer in a transgender patient challenges the simplistic view of transgender identities and underscores their complexity. In Brazil, a country with high LGBTQIA+ violence, the use of this video by conservative and religious groups is alarming and contradicts principles of compassion central to Christianity. Addressing such issues requires a deeper understanding of the autistic spectrum and fostering empathy for sexual diversity, promoting social justice and harmony.

Для цитирования: Machado Silva Heslley. The Complex Intersection Between Autism, Prejudice and the LGBTQIA+ Movement: An Analysis of an Excerpt from the Series "The Good Doctor".. Journal of homosexuality. 2025. DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2025.2460974.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.