Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026
High-flow oxygen delivery system and oxygen reserve index-guided apnoeic oxygenation versus low-tidal-volume ventilation during robotic flexible ureteroscopy: A retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saracoglu Ayten, Arif Mariah, Salah Morshed, Abdullayev Ruslan, Tallai Bela, Ahmed Haitham, Ibrahim Ahmed M I, Al Ansari Abdulla, Saracoglu Kemal T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Robotic flexible ureteroscopy often requires intermittent apnoeic periods to minimise kidney movement and improve surgical conditions. This study evaluated the effectiveness of high-flow oxygenation (HFO) in maintaining oxygenation and preventing desaturation during retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (RFU).
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 62 male patients undergoing robotic RFU: 28 received HFO and 34 served as controls. The HFO group underwent repeated 5-minute apnoeic periods with 100% oxygen delivered at up to 80 L/min. Vital parameters were recorded before and after each apnoeic period. In the control group, the tidal volume was reduced to 250 mL with a respiratory rate of 20 cycles per minute during the robotic phase, and these settings were maintained throughout. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, T-tests, and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the groups. Durbin-Conover test was used for pairwise comparisons.
RESULTS: Compared to the HFO group, overall, the control group had slightly higher median end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) levels (43.3 vs 41.6, P = 0.021), heart rate (71.6 vs 65.1, P = 0.001), mean arterial pressure (83 vs 70.6, P < 0.001), and temperature (36.5 vs 35.6, P < 0.001). No desaturation events or haemodynamic instability occurred in the HFO group. ORI and PI remained stable, and no postoperative complications were reported.
CONCLUSION: HFO during robotic ureteroscopy appears effective in maintaining oxygenation and haemodynamic stability while providing a still surgical field. These findings support its integration into clinical practice for procedures requiring controlled apnoea.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 62 male patients undergoing robotic RFU: 28 received HFO and 34 served as controls. The HFO group underwent repeated 5-minute apnoeic periods with 100% oxygen delivered at up to 80 L/min. Vital parameters were recorded before and after each apnoeic period. In the control group, the tidal volume was reduced to 250 mL with a respiratory rate of 20 cycles per minute during the robotic phase, and these settings were maintained throughout. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, T-tests, and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the groups. Durbin-Conover test was used for pairwise comparisons.
RESULTS: Compared to the HFO group, overall, the control group had slightly higher median end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) levels (43.3 vs 41.6, P = 0.021), heart rate (71.6 vs 65.1, P = 0.001), mean arterial pressure (83 vs 70.6, P < 0.001), and temperature (36.5 vs 35.6, P < 0.001). No desaturation events or haemodynamic instability occurred in the HFO group. ORI and PI remained stable, and no postoperative complications were reported.
CONCLUSION: HFO during robotic ureteroscopy appears effective in maintaining oxygenation and haemodynamic stability while providing a still surgical field. These findings support its integration into clinical practice for procedures requiring controlled apnoea.