Brain stimulation · 2023
Temporally non-regular patterns of deep brain stimulation (DBS) enhance assessment of evoked potentials while maintaining motor symptom management in Parkinson's disease (PD).
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Palopoli-Trojani Kay, Schmidt Stephen L, Baringer Karley D, Slotkin Theodore A, Peters Jennifer J, Turner Dennis A, Grill Warren M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Traditional deep brain stimulation (DBS) at fixed regular frequencies (>100 Hz) is effective in treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Temporally non-regular patterns of DBS are a new parameter space that may help increase efficacy and efficiency.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of temporally non-regular patterns of DBS to traditional regularly-spaced pulses.
METHODS: We simultaneously recorded local field potentials (LFP) and monitored motor symptoms (tremor and bradykinesia) in persons with PD during DBS in subthalamic nucleus (STN). We quantified both oscillatory activity and DBS local evoked potentials (DLEPs) from the LFP.
RESULTS: Temporally non-regular patterns were as effective as traditional pulse patterns in modulating motor symptoms, oscillatory activity, and DLEPs. Moreover, one of our novel patterns enabled recording of longer duration DLEPs during clinically effective stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Stimulation gaps of 50 ms can be used to increase efficiency and to enable regular assessment of long-duration DLEPs while maintaining effective symptom management. This may be a promising paradigm for closed-loop DBS with biomarker assessment during the gaps.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of temporally non-regular patterns of DBS to traditional regularly-spaced pulses.
METHODS: We simultaneously recorded local field potentials (LFP) and monitored motor symptoms (tremor and bradykinesia) in persons with PD during DBS in subthalamic nucleus (STN). We quantified both oscillatory activity and DBS local evoked potentials (DLEPs) from the LFP.
RESULTS: Temporally non-regular patterns were as effective as traditional pulse patterns in modulating motor symptoms, oscillatory activity, and DLEPs. Moreover, one of our novel patterns enabled recording of longer duration DLEPs during clinically effective stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Stimulation gaps of 50 ms can be used to increase efficiency and to enable regular assessment of long-duration DLEPs while maintaining effective symptom management. This may be a promising paradigm for closed-loop DBS with biomarker assessment during the gaps.