MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bcr-2021-248579

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ case reports · 2022

Use of continuous glucose monitor as a motivational device for lifestyle modifications to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with non-insulin therapies.

Farhan Hisham Ahmed, Bukhari Khulood, Grewal Navneet, Devarasetty Sranita, Munir Kashif

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The efficacy of continuous glucose monitors (CGM) to improve glycaemic control in individuals on intensive insulin therapy (basal and prandial) has been well established in several studies; however, there is limited evidence on its usage and efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who are on non-insulin therapies. Lifestyle modifications and glucose monitoring are essential components of the management of T2D. We report a case that demonstrates the impact of CGM use as an effective tool for patient education and motivation to implement and adhere to lifestyle modifications in improving glycaemic control in a patient with long-standing poorly controlled T2D who was on oral glucose-lowering medications. CGM use is associated with high level of patient satisfaction which can improve quality of life and has the potential to reduce long-term complications related to poor glycaemic control. These observations emphasise the need to broaden the use of CGM in this patient population.

Для цитирования: Farhan Hisham Ahmed, Bukhari Khulood, Grewal Navneet, Devarasetty Sranita, Munir Kashif. Use of continuous glucose monitor as a motivational device for lifestyle modifications to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with non-insulin therapies.. BMJ case reports. 2022. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-248579.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.