Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
Neurophysiology in the mirror: A tri-layer model of mirror movements informed by TMS evidence.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sebastianelli Luca, Versace Viviana, Ferrazzoli Davide, Ortelli Paola, Trinka Eugen, Sellner Johann, Nardone Raffaele
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Mirror movements are involuntary, task-coupled contractions in contralateral homologous muscles during unilateral movement. While often described as a developmental remnant or rare clinical sign, mirror movements offer insight into the physiological mechanisms that underlie motor lateralization and interhemispheric balance. This review aimed to synthesize the available neurophysiological evidence-primarily from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-and propose a structured, mechanism-based framework for interpreting mirror movements across neurological conditions.
METHODS: A structured narrative review was conducted of studies published between 1966 and November 2025 using TMS in individuals with congenital, developmental, or acquired mirror movements. Studies using neuroimaging or peripheral electrophysiology were included selectively to support anatomical or functional interpretation of TMS findings. Data were organized into three mechanistic layers based on prevailing neurophysiological signatures rather than etiology alone.
RESULTS: Three non-mutually exclusive mechanisms were identified: (I) persistent fast-conducting ipsilateral corticospinal projections, primarily in congenital mirror movement syndromes and early brain injury; (II) deficient transcallosal inhibition, observed in conditions affecting interhemispheric balance such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and callosal agenesis; and (III) bilateral overactivation of premotor and supplementary motor areas, especially under conditions of impaired motor program selection or increased task demands.
CONCLUSIONS: Mirror movements can be interpreted within a tri-layer model reflecting distinct disruptions in corticospinal connectivity, interhemispheric inhibition, and supraspinal motor control.
SIGNIFICANCE: This framework provides an integrative model for interpreting neurophysiological findings in mirror movements, offering insight into hierarchical motor control without implying specific diagnostic or therapeutic applications.
METHODS: A structured narrative review was conducted of studies published between 1966 and November 2025 using TMS in individuals with congenital, developmental, or acquired mirror movements. Studies using neuroimaging or peripheral electrophysiology were included selectively to support anatomical or functional interpretation of TMS findings. Data were organized into three mechanistic layers based on prevailing neurophysiological signatures rather than etiology alone.
RESULTS: Three non-mutually exclusive mechanisms were identified: (I) persistent fast-conducting ipsilateral corticospinal projections, primarily in congenital mirror movement syndromes and early brain injury; (II) deficient transcallosal inhibition, observed in conditions affecting interhemispheric balance such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and callosal agenesis; and (III) bilateral overactivation of premotor and supplementary motor areas, especially under conditions of impaired motor program selection or increased task demands.
CONCLUSIONS: Mirror movements can be interpreted within a tri-layer model reflecting distinct disruptions in corticospinal connectivity, interhemispheric inhibition, and supraspinal motor control.
SIGNIFICANCE: This framework provides an integrative model for interpreting neurophysiological findings in mirror movements, offering insight into hierarchical motor control without implying specific diagnostic or therapeutic applications.