The Journal of reproductive medicine · 2015
Modified posterior perineoplasty in women.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ostrzenski Adam
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the applicability of dorsal perineal membrane (DPM) and urethrovaginal sphincter muscle (UVSM) site-specific defect reconstructions. The secondary objective was to establish how these reconstructions affect women's physical, emotional, and social well-being.
STUDY DESIGN: An observational cohort study was conducted for 24 months on 3 patients. Clinical examinations with pelvic organ prolapse quantification panel, validated instruments of the Pain Numeric Scale, the Modified Body Image Scale (M-BIS), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were applied preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Intraoperatively the DPM and the UVSM site-specific defects were identified and their reconstructions were performed without surgical complications. Postoperatively, symptoms have subsided, perineal body and genital hiatus returned to expected limits, FSFI increased, and M-BIS improved.
CONCLUSION: In this study group, modified posterior perineoplasty was applied with ease and the operation alleviated physical, emotional, and social symptoms associated with posterior perineum defects.
STUDY DESIGN: An observational cohort study was conducted for 24 months on 3 patients. Clinical examinations with pelvic organ prolapse quantification panel, validated instruments of the Pain Numeric Scale, the Modified Body Image Scale (M-BIS), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were applied preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Intraoperatively the DPM and the UVSM site-specific defects were identified and their reconstructions were performed without surgical complications. Postoperatively, symptoms have subsided, perineal body and genital hiatus returned to expected limits, FSFI increased, and M-BIS improved.
CONCLUSION: In this study group, modified posterior perineoplasty was applied with ease and the operation alleviated physical, emotional, and social symptoms associated with posterior perineum defects.