Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2018
Specialty-Related Differences in the Acute-Phase Treatment and Prognosis in Patients With Acute Heart Failure - Insights From REALITY-AHF.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kondo Toru, Okumura Takahiro, Matsue Yuya, Shiraishi Atsushi, Kagiyama Nobuyuki, Yamaguchi Tetsuo, Kuroda Shunsuke, Kida Keisuke, Mizuno Atsushi, Oishi Shogo, Inuzuka Yasutaka, Akiyama Eiichi, Matsukawa Ryuichi, Kato Kota, Suzuki Satoshi, Naruke Takashi, Yoshioka Kenji, Miyoshi Tatsuya, Baba Yuichi, Yamamoto Masayoshi, Murai Koji, Mizutani Kazuo, Yoshida Kazuki, Kitai Takeshi, Murohara Toyoaki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess specialty-related differences in the treatment for patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in the acute phase and subsequent prognostic differences.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed hospitalizations for AHF in REALITY-AHF, a multicenter prospective registry focused on very early presentation and treatment in patients with AHF. All patients were classified according to the medical specialty of the physicians responsible for contributed most to decisions regarding the initial diagnosis and treatment after the emergency department (ED) arrival. Patients initially managed by emergency physicians (n=614) or cardiologists (n=911) were analyzed. After propensity-score matching, vasodilators were used less often by emergency physicians than by cardiologists at 90 min after ED arrival (29.8% vs. 46.1%, P<0.001); this difference was also observed at 6, 24, and 48 h. Cardiologists administered furosemide earlier than emergency physicians (67 vs. 102 min, P<0.001). However, the use of inotropes, noninvasive ventilation, and endotracheal intubation were similar between groups. In-hospital mortality did not differ between patients managed by emergency physicians and those managed by cardiologists (4.1% vs. 3.8%, odds ratio 1.12; 95% confidence interval 0.58-2.14).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in initial management, no prognostic difference was observed between emergency physicians and cardiologists who performed the initial management of patients with AHF.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed hospitalizations for AHF in REALITY-AHF, a multicenter prospective registry focused on very early presentation and treatment in patients with AHF. All patients were classified according to the medical specialty of the physicians responsible for contributed most to decisions regarding the initial diagnosis and treatment after the emergency department (ED) arrival. Patients initially managed by emergency physicians (n=614) or cardiologists (n=911) were analyzed. After propensity-score matching, vasodilators were used less often by emergency physicians than by cardiologists at 90 min after ED arrival (29.8% vs. 46.1%, P<0.001); this difference was also observed at 6, 24, and 48 h. Cardiologists administered furosemide earlier than emergency physicians (67 vs. 102 min, P<0.001). However, the use of inotropes, noninvasive ventilation, and endotracheal intubation were similar between groups. In-hospital mortality did not differ between patients managed by emergency physicians and those managed by cardiologists (4.1% vs. 3.8%, odds ratio 1.12; 95% confidence interval 0.58-2.14).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in initial management, no prognostic difference was observed between emergency physicians and cardiologists who performed the initial management of patients with AHF.